2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.181801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix Element|Vub|withBρeνDecays

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also tabulate our choice of priors for the chiral-continuum extrapolation for the B s → Klν decay in Tables XII and XIV, for the B s → D s lν decay in Tables XIII and XV, and for priors common to both channels in XVI, and XVII. (14) 0.31197(14) 0.32870 (17) 0.32865(17) 0.35744 (21) 0.35747(21) 0.22861 (12) 0.22862(12) 0.24566 (13) 0.24565(13) aE K ð1; 0; 0Þ 0.40661 (49) 0.40662(48) 0.45434 (73) 0.45432(70) 0.47507 (71) 0.47566(69) 0.32020 (61) 0.31986 58 (20) 0.21110(20) 0.29310 (20) 0.29310(20) 0.13460 (10) 0.13460(10) 0.18730 (10) 0.18730(10) aM η s 0.41113 (18) 0.41113(18) 0.41435 (22) 0.41433(22) 0.41185 (22) 0.41186(22) 0.29416 (12) 0.29416(12) 0.29311 (18) 0.29311(18) aM MILC π 0.15971 (20) 0.15971(20) 0.22447 (17) 0.22448(17) 0.31125 (16) 0.31124(16) 0.14789 (18) 0.14789(18) 0.20635 (18) 0.20636(18) aM MILC K 0.36530 (29) 0.36526(29) 0.38331 (24) 0.38337(24) 0.40984 (21) 0.40981(21) 0.25318 (19) 0.25317(19) 0.27217 (21) 0.27219(21) 1 þ m k 1.000(40) 1.001(40) 1 þ m ⊥ 1.000(40) 1.000 (40) (46) 1.31737(39) 1.30768 (48) 1.30727(41) 0.93126 (24) 0.93123(24) 0.92873 (20) 0.92880(20) M þ 6.3300(90) 6.3300(90) M 0 6.41 (10) 6.41 (10)…”
Section: Appendix B: Reconstructing Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also tabulate our choice of priors for the chiral-continuum extrapolation for the B s → Klν decay in Tables XII and XIV, for the B s → D s lν decay in Tables XIII and XV, and for priors common to both channels in XVI, and XVII. (14) 0.31197(14) 0.32870 (17) 0.32865(17) 0.35744 (21) 0.35747(21) 0.22861 (12) 0.22862(12) 0.24566 (13) 0.24565(13) aE K ð1; 0; 0Þ 0.40661 (49) 0.40662(48) 0.45434 (73) 0.45432(70) 0.47507 (71) 0.47566(69) 0.32020 (61) 0.31986 58 (20) 0.21110(20) 0.29310 (20) 0.29310(20) 0.13460 (10) 0.13460(10) 0.18730 (10) 0.18730(10) aM η s 0.41113 (18) 0.41113(18) 0.41435 (22) 0.41433(22) 0.41185 (22) 0.41186(22) 0.29416 (12) 0.29416(12) 0.29311 (18) 0.29311(18) aM MILC π 0.15971 (20) 0.15971(20) 0.22447 (17) 0.22448(17) 0.31125 (16) 0.31124(16) 0.14789 (18) 0.14789(18) 0.20635 (18) 0.20636(18) aM MILC K 0.36530 (29) 0.36526(29) 0.38331 (24) 0.38337(24) 0.40984 (21) 0.40981(21) 0.25318 (19) 0.25317(19) 0.27217 (21) 0.27219(21) 1 þ m k 1.000(40) 1.001(40) 1 þ m ⊥ 1.000(40) 1.000 (40) (46) 1.31737(39) 1.30768 (48) 1.30727(41) 0.93126 (24) 0.93123(24) 0.92873 (20) 0.92880(20) M þ 6.3300(90) 6.3300(90) M 0 6.41 (10) 6.41 (10)…”
Section: Appendix B: Reconstructing Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio jV ub =V cb j, which enters into the length of the side of the CKM unitarity triangle opposite the preciselydetermined angle β, is a central input into tests of CKM unitarity. Both jV ub j and jV cb j have been determined through measurements of multiple exclusive mesonic decay channels [1,2], primarily B → πlν l [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and B → D ðÃÞ lν l respectively [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], although other channels are also used [21][22][23][24][25]. The B s → K decay has generally received less theoretical attention than the corresponding B decay, largely due to the absence of experimental data, although this channel has been studied on the lattice in [26,27], and using other theoretical approaches [28], including light cone sum rules [29,30], perturbative QCD [31,32] and QCD-inspired models [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TFFs become smaller with the increment of ρ ⊥ B 2; and a larger ρ ⊥ B 2; (corresponding to a larger ⊥ a 2 ) is not allowed by the lattice QCD predictions. For example, the AdS/QCD model, equation (28), with a much larger…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V ub has been studied by various experimental groups by measuring ρ → B semi-leptonic decays [26][27][28][29]. It is also helpful to compare the LCSR predictions on the CKM matrix element | |…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%