2011
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1578-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the cross section for diffractive deep-inelastic scattering with a leading proton at HERA

Abstract: The cross section for the diffractive deep-inelastic scattering process ep → eXp is measured, with the leading final state proton detected in the H1 Forward Proton Spectrometer. The data sample covers the range x P < 0.1 in fractional proton longitudinal momentum loss, 0.1 < |t| < 0.7 GeV 2 in squared four-momentum transfer at the proton vertex and 4 < Q 2 < 700 GeV 2 in photon virtuality. The cross section is measured four-fold differentially in t, x P , Q 2 and β = x/x P , where x is the Bjorken scaling vari… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest resulting uncertainty of 3% arises from the variation of the shape in p * T,1 . The shape of the distribution in t is varied within the experimental uncertainty on the t-slope [48] by applying a weight of e ±t in MC, which translates into an uncertainty on the integrated dijet cross section of 1 %. The integrated cross section uncertainty due to the model dependence of the measurement is of the order of 5 %.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest resulting uncertainty of 3% arises from the variation of the shape in p * T,1 . The shape of the distribution in t is varied within the experimental uncertainty on the t-slope [48] by applying a weight of e ±t in MC, which translates into an uncertainty on the integrated dijet cross section of 1 %. The integrated cross section uncertainty due to the model dependence of the measurement is of the order of 5 %.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the comparison with the measurement, the NLO QCD predictions are scaled down by a factor of 0.83 [60] to account for the contributions from proton dissociation (M Y < 1.6 GeV) absent in the current analysis but included in the extraction of the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set from the inclusive data [4].…”
Section: Jhep05(2015)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement used samples of diffractive DIS data at a center-of-mass energy of √ s = 318 GeV. The combination by H1 and ZEUS Col- laborations is based on the cross sections measured with the ZEUS LPS 1 [53], ZEUS LPS 2 [54], H1 FPS HERA I [55] and finally the H1 FPS HERA II [56] data sets.…”
Section: Diffractive Dis Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, one need to consider a global normalization factor to account this correction. The extrapolations for these two distinct range of t have been performed by considering an exponential t dependence of the inclusive diffractive DIS cross sections, using the H1 default value of exponential slope parameter b = 6 1/GeV 2 [21,56]. Therefore, our analysis has been carried out by considering the above corrections as well as the pre-selection kinematical cuts applied on the analyzed data sets.…”
Section: Diffractive Dis Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%