Measurement of the deuteron structure function F2d and a comparison of proton and neutron structure

Aubert, J.J.; Bassompierre, G.; Bouard, X. De; Broll, C.; Coignet, G.; Déclais, Y.; Favier, Jean; Maire, M.; Minssieux, H.; Payre, P.; Pessard, H.; Schneegans, M.; Thénard, J.M.; Urbán, L.; Best, J.A. Van; Carr, J.; Clifft, R. W.; Edwards, M.; Norton, P. R.; Thompson, J.C.; Brasse, F.W.; Flauger, W.; Gayler, J.; Gerhardt, V.; Goessling, C.; Korbel, V.; Dobinson, R.; Dosselli, U.; Edwards, A.; Gabathuler, E.; Leenen, M.; Montgomery, H. E.; Osborne, A.M.; Becks, K. H.; Boehm, E.; Brown, S.; Cobb, J.H.; Combley, F.; Court, G.R.; D’Agostini, G.; Dau, W.D.; Davies, Joshua; Drees, J.; Ferrero, M. I.; Gamet, R.; Haas, J.; Hamacher, K.; Hayman, P.; Henckes, M.; Landgraf, U.; Mohr, W.; Moser, K.; Mount, R.; McNicholas, J.; Peroni, C.; Pietrzyk, U.; Rith, Klaus; Sloan, T.; Stier, H. E.; Stockhausen, W.; Villiers, M.; Wahlen, H.; Whalley, M. A.; Williams, D.; Williams, W. S. C.; Williamson, J.; Wimpenny, S.

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90971-1

Cited by 85 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is substantial evidence for the existence of intrinsic cc fluctuations in the wavefunctions of light hadrons. For example, the charm structure function of the proton measured by EMC is significantly larger than that predicted by photon-gluon fusion at large x Bj [60]. Leading charm production in πN and hyperon-N collisions also requires a charm source beyond leading twist [58,61].…”

Section: Consequences Of Intrinsic Charm and Bottommentioning

confidence: 96%

“…There are other ways in which the intrinsic heavy quark content of light hadrons can be tested. More measurements of the charm and bottom structure functions at large x F are needed to confirm the EMC data [60]. Charm production in the proton fragmentation region in deep inelastic lepton-proton scattering is sensitive to the hidden charm in the proton wavefunction.…”

Section: Leading Particle Effect In Open Charm Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Light-Cone Quantization and Hadron Structure

Brodsky

1996

Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter, Gravitational Waves, Monopole Condensation, and Light Cone Quantization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Consequences Of Intrinsic Charm and Bottommentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Leading Particle Effect In Open Charm Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Light-Cone Quantization and Hadron Structure

Brodsky

1996

Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter, Gravitational Waves, Monopole Condensation, and Light Cone Quantization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The structure function difference F 2 C p -F2pn as shown in fig. 38 (EMC [92]) was obtained by projecting all data points onto the value Q2 = 30 GeV2 describing the In Q2 dependence by straight lines. The figure also shows the model function representing the EMC data.…”

Section: 4mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(c) Combining the proton structure functions of neutrino and anti-neutrino scatteringFig. 27(a) shows the ratio P,'n/F21P vs. x as measured in electron (SLAC[52]) and muon (EMC[92]) scattering off hydrogen and deuterium, respectively. In each case the neutron s1.ructure function F21n was calculated by subtracting the proton structure function P , ' p from the Fermi motion corrected deuteron structure function F21d.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Deep Inelastic Charged Lepton Scattering

Nowak

1986

Fortschr. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present situation in deep inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering is reviewed from an experimenter's point of view . After describing. in some detail. the quark-parton model (QPM) predictions the basic ideas of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) are illustrated . The perturbative QCD predictions for deep inelastic scattering are summarised discussing also their theoretical uncertainties of today .Past and present experiments on deep inelastic electron and muon scattering are compared regarding their ability to test these predictions . It is shown that all data is in very good agreement with the QPM and fully consistent with perturbative QCD . New results on lepton scattering off nuclei are discussed and confronted to recently invented phenomenological models .

show abstract

“…However, the issue of connecting this more fundamental theory to traditional nuclear physics is extremely challenging. Of course, we have hints of what might be involved through phenomena such as the EMC effect [1,2] but we are far from a full understanding of the influence of quark degrees of freedom and their implications for the complex phenomena emerging from QCD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quark–meson coupling model based upon the Nambu–Jona Lasinio model

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The NJL model for the octet baryons, using proper time regularization to simulate some of the features of confinement, is solved self-consistently in nuclear matter. This provides an alternative framework to the MIT bag model which has been used in the quark-meson coupling model. After fitting the parameters of the model to the saturation properties of symmetric nuclear matter the model is used to explore the equation of state of pure neutron matter as well as nuclear matter at densities relevant to heavy ion collisions. With a view to future studies of high mass neutron stars, the binding of hyperons is also explored.

show abstract

Measurement of the deuteron structure function F2d and a comparison of proton and neutron structure

Cited by 85 publications

References 18 publications

Light-Cone Quantization and Hadron Structure

Light-Cone Quantization and Hadron Structure

Review of Deep Inelastic Charged Lepton Scattering

Quark–meson coupling model based upon the Nambu–Jona Lasinio model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About