1965
DOI: 10.1039/tf9656100668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide in water and aqueous solutions of glycerol

Abstract: Diffusion coefficients are measured for physical absorption using a laminar jet apparatus. The COz+water system is examined over a wide temperature range. The systems NzO+water and N20+water glycerol are examined at constant temperature over a wide range of concentrations of glycerol solutions. A modified Stokes Einstein equation is proposed. Values of diffusion coefficients are obtained with an error of about 1 "/,.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the confidence interval given here reflects the statistics of the simulations, rather than biases due to systematic errors (for detailed discussion, see Section 8). The simulated values agree well with observations over the temperature range 0-75°C (Davidson and Cullen, 1957;Himmelblau, 1964;Thomas and Adams, 1965;Jähne et al, 1987;Tamimi et al, 1994). The two data points above 75°C (Tamimi et al, 1994) indicate higher values than the simulations.…”
Section: Dissolved Cosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Note that the confidence interval given here reflects the statistics of the simulations, rather than biases due to systematic errors (for detailed discussion, see Section 8). The simulated values agree well with observations over the temperature range 0-75°C (Davidson and Cullen, 1957;Himmelblau, 1964;Thomas and Adams, 1965;Jähne et al, 1987;Tamimi et al, 1994). The two data points above 75°C (Tamimi et al, 1994) indicate higher values than the simulations.…”
Section: Dissolved Cosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A water film of varying thickness will therefore separate the mineral and hydrate surface, in which gases (CH4 and/or CO2) may be transported. The diffusion coefficient of CO2 and CH4 in water [29] are several orders of magnitude larger than diffusion through hydrate [30,31]. Mass transfer will therefore be more efficient in the water layer, which is important for the exchange mechanism [19], as limited mass transport through solid hydrate layers will impair the exchange performance.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 in an Arrhenius diagram; the activation energy was determined to be E A = 18.6 ± 5.4 kJ/mol. This rather small value for the activation energy, being within the range of the activation energy of conduction mass transfer (13,18), indicates a diffusioncontrolled resistance in the interfacial area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using the diffusion coefficients of CO 2 in water from (13) During drop formation, strong internal movements that are regular because of the laminar flow through the capillary take place. This leads to the above-mentioned fast initial carbon dioxide uptake by the drop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%