1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.66.1015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the electric polarizability of the neutron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
156
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
156
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally, α n is found through Compton scattering off of a deuteron and the polarizability of a proton must be included in the model. In this data, there are four experimental results, [4,5,6,7]; but [7] incorporates [4]. L'vov [8] corrected the earlier values by adding 0.6 × 10 −4 fm 3 to their results.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimentally, α n is found through Compton scattering off of a deuteron and the polarizability of a proton must be included in the model. In this data, there are four experimental results, [4,5,6,7]; but [7] incorporates [4]. L'vov [8] corrected the earlier values by adding 0.6 × 10 −4 fm 3 to their results.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are quite model-dependent, and even the experiments do not agree. We note that [9] claims [5,8] miscalculated their errors. Further, [12] used [10]'s results to get a different number and then the authors of [10] joined others [13] to find a result close to their original value.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electric polarizability α n E1 can in principle be measured by scattering low-energy neutrons on the Coulomb field of a heavy nucleus, whereas the magnetic polarizability β n M1 remains essentially unconstrained by such an experiment. This technique seemed to be very promising until the beginning of the 1990's, when Schmiedmayer et al (1991) obtained the value α n E1 = 12.6 ± 1.5 (stat) ± 2.0 (syst) by scattering neutrons with energies 50 eV≤ E n ≤ 50 keV off a 208 Pb target. Shortly later, however, Nikolenko and Popov (1992) argued that the errors were underestimated by a factor 5.…”
Section: Rcs Data and Extraction Of The Neutron Polarizabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally there is information about the dynamic polarizabilities obtained from Compton scattering [68] [69], which have to be corrected for relativistic and retardation effects caused by the finite size of the nucleon [70]- [73] and about the static electric polarizability of the neutron from neutron nucleus scattering [73] . There is no direct measurement of the static polarizabilities of the proton.…”
Section: Polarizabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%