2017
DOI: 10.1134/s0036029517030041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the electrical resistivity of liquid 32G2 and 32G1 steels by the rotating magnetic field method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the increasing of components quantityin the alloy leads to a decreasing of the temperature coefficient of the resistivity (in cooling moda). A similar result was obtained earlier whenthe measuring electrical resistivity of liquid steel [18,20]. As microheterogeneity is destroyed and components are mixed on an atomic scale in a liquid alloy, the number of conduction electrons z increases and, consequently, Fermi wave number kF = (3π 2 z/Ω) 1/3 , where Ω is the crystallite volume.…”
Section: Experimental Material(s) and Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also the increasing of components quantityin the alloy leads to a decreasing of the temperature coefficient of the resistivity (in cooling moda). A similar result was obtained earlier whenthe measuring electrical resistivity of liquid steel [18,20]. As microheterogeneity is destroyed and components are mixed on an atomic scale in a liquid alloy, the number of conduction electrons z increases and, consequently, Fermi wave number kF = (3π 2 z/Ω) 1/3 , where Ω is the crystallite volume.…”
Section: Experimental Material(s) and Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Isothermal holding at the measurement points was at least 15 minutes. The electrical resistivity was measured using the unit described in [18]. The estimation of the error in the measurementof resistivity by the technique described in [1] showed that the total relative error was about 3% when using BeO crucibles.…”
Section: Experimental Material(s) and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that electrical resistivity methods lack sensitivity when observing the changes occurring in the liquid state at these temperatures. The decrease in electrical resistivity with increasing temperature may be explained through the microheterogeneous structure of metallic melts [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Melting of a multiphase cast iron ingot does not lead to the immediate formation of a homogeneous solution of the alloying elements in iron, with a microheterogeneous state persisting within a certain temperature range.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%