1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01133085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the fast-neutron fission cross sections of231Pa and243Am

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results above the threshold at 690 keV for the fission cross-section ratio of 236 U and 235 U are shown in Fig. 9, together with several previous results [9,14,15,[21][22][23][24]. The values of the 236 U(n,f ) cross section above threshold are also given in Table IV, Good agreement was also found for all major evaluations (the difference between ENDF/B-VII.0 and JENDL-3.3 up to 2 MeV is below 5%, while a slightly larger difference, still below 15%, is observed for JEFF-3.1).…”
Section: Energy Region Above Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results above the threshold at 690 keV for the fission cross-section ratio of 236 U and 235 U are shown in Fig. 9, together with several previous results [9,14,15,[21][22][23][24]. The values of the 236 U(n,f ) cross section above threshold are also given in Table IV, Good agreement was also found for all major evaluations (the difference between ENDF/B-VII.0 and JENDL-3.3 up to 2 MeV is below 5%, while a slightly larger difference, still below 15%, is observed for JEFF-3.1).…”
Section: Energy Region Above Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The origin of most of such shortcomings is related to the poor quality of the early experimental data below the fission threshold (690 keV), on which evaluations are still based. Above this value, there are several absolute cross-section measurements and measurements relative to the 235 U(n,f ) cross section performed up to 20 MeV which are in good agreement with each other [9,10,14,15,[21][22][23][24]. As a consequence, the evaluated cross sections above the fission threshold are more accurate, with small differences between the various databases.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Existing experimental data have been obtained in a number of measurements [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, severe discrepancies among these data are limiting the accuracy of evaluated data files to ≈10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, discrepancies up to 15% between data from different measurements [7][8][9][10] are present in the fast neutron energy region for the 243 Am(n,f) cross section; stringent requirements for this cross section were found for Advanced Minor Actinides Burners (ADMAB), where a reduction of a factor 5 of the uncertainty is requested. Moreover, discrepancies up to 15% between data from different measurements [7][8][9][10] are present in the fast neutron energy region for the 243 Am(n,f) cross section; stringent requirements for this cross section were found for Advanced Minor Actinides Burners (ADMAB), where a reduction of a factor 5 of the uncertainty is requested.…”
Section: Study Of Neutron-induced Fission Cross Sections Of U Am Anmentioning
confidence: 99%