1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02472591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 3—influence of cutting theP-δ tail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
113
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Guinea et al 2 identified several sources of energy dissipation that may influence the measurement of G F , for example the influence of curtailing the P-ä tail in a bend test. 3 They concluded that when all these sources are taken into account an almost size-independent specific fracture energy G F can be obtained. Hu and Wittmann 4 have addressed the possibility that the specific fracture energy itself may not be constant along the crack path in a test specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guinea et al 2 identified several sources of energy dissipation that may influence the measurement of G F , for example the influence of curtailing the P-ä tail in a bend test. 3 They concluded that when all these sources are taken into account an almost size-independent specific fracture energy G F can be obtained. Hu and Wittmann 4 have addressed the possibility that the specific fracture energy itself may not be constant along the crack path in a test specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable three-point bending tests were carried out on the notched prismatic samples accounting for the recommendations of Elices, Planas and Guinea (7)(8)(9). During these tests, the beams were lying on two rigid cylinders that were able to roll without hardly any friction on an anti-torsion support (please, see the picture in Figure 2).…”
Section: Three-point Bending Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the measurement of the specific fracture energy as indicated by RILEM recommendation (8) provides a value that is size-dependent and has to be properly corrected. The most common methods to obtain a sizeindependent fracture energy of concrete, G F , are the boundary effect method proposed by Hu and Wittmann (4) or the simplified version (SBE) proposed by Abdalla and Karihaloo (5) and the corrections to the RILEM test proposed by Guinea et al (9)(10)(11). Although the methods are different, they are interrelated since they deal with the treatment of the contribution to the fracture energy when the test is nearing the end and the crack is approaching the back free boundary of the specimen (tail of the P-δ curve).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper deals with the study of the influence of the components of twelve different self-compacting concrete mixes with compressive strength varying from 39 to 124 MPa on their fracture behavior. In particular, the influence of the coarse aggregate (CA) volume, compressive strength, water to binder (w/cm) and paste to solid (p/s) ratios on the sizeindependent fracture energy of concrete (G F ) will be studied using the SBE approach proposed by Abdalla and Karihaloo (5) and the approach proposed by Guinea et al (9)(10)(11). It is shown that the two methods give very similar values of G F of the SCC mixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%