2015
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2015.2454751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Heat Removed by Devices for Skin Tags Treatment

Abstract: This paper describes a method for the comparison of the cooling capability of over-the-counter devices for skin tags removal. The comparison is performed by measuring the heat flux produced by the gas identified assessing the temperature difference across an element with a known thermal resistance; the temperature reached at the interface between the device and the heat-flux meter is also analyzed, although it is different from that of the skin during the treatment. The measurement accuracy has been experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(a) compares contact resistances calculated using the reported value range as a function of applied pressure. Both R 00 cÀCMY and R 00 cÀPM are within the expected range of 0.001-0.01 m 2 KW −1 and follow comparable decreasing trend [7,9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]27]. However, since G skin % 0.41 kPa [31] and PM model has an 1/4 exponent, R 00 cÀPM decreases faster and nearly saturates around 0.002 m 2 KW −1 past a contact pressure of 5 kPa.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2(a) compares contact resistances calculated using the reported value range as a function of applied pressure. Both R 00 cÀCMY and R 00 cÀPM are within the expected range of 0.001-0.01 m 2 KW −1 and follow comparable decreasing trend [7,9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]27]. However, since G skin % 0.41 kPa [31] and PM model has an 1/4 exponent, R 00 cÀPM decreases faster and nearly saturates around 0.002 m 2 KW −1 past a contact pressure of 5 kPa.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The most commonly utilized model for predicting R c at finger-object interfaces [7,9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] was developed in the 1960s by Cooper, Mikic and Yovanovich (CMY) to predict thermal contact resistance between two contacting materials (subscript 1 and 2) with random surface roughness that are much harder CONTACT Konrad Rykaczewski konradr@asu.edu Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here. TEMPERATURE 2019, VOL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%