2002
DOI: 10.1115/1.1518500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Heat Transfer Coefficient for Mercury Flowing in a Narrow Channel

Abstract: The heat transfer coefficient is inferred from measurements for mercury flowing in a channel of cross-section 2 mm×40 mm with flow velocities from 1 m/s to 4 m/s and heat fluxes from 192 kW/m2 to 1.14 MW/m2. Mercury bulk temperatures vary from 67°C to 143°C. Inferred heat transfer coefficients agree with open literature tube data when compared on a Nusselt versus. Peclet number plot, with Nusselt numbers examined from 8 to 17 and Peclet numbers examined from 790 to 3070.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two sets of typical operating conditions with different Peclet numbers were selected, and the Nusselt numbers calculated using different models were compared. Among them, Nu-cal represents the calculated value of CFD; Nu-exp represents the Nusselt number calculated by the Lubarski and Kaufman relationship, which is highly consistent with the experimental data (Crye et al, 2002); and Nu-J represents the empirical value of the Nusselt number calculated by the relationship of Jaeger et al (2015). The results show that all four models have certain errors in predicting Nu.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two sets of typical operating conditions with different Peclet numbers were selected, and the Nusselt numbers calculated using different models were compared. Among them, Nu-cal represents the calculated value of CFD; Nu-exp represents the Nusselt number calculated by the Lubarski and Kaufman relationship, which is highly consistent with the experimental data (Crye et al, 2002); and Nu-J represents the empirical value of the Nusselt number calculated by the relationship of Jaeger et al (2015). The results show that all four models have certain errors in predicting Nu.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The applicable range of the model for Pe: 1,200-3,000. Figure 2 shows the comparison of the Nu between that calculated by the CFD implanted the new Pr t model with the experimental data by Crye et al (2002). Figure 3 shows the error between the Nu calculated by the CFD Comparison of Nu between that calculated by the CFD implanted the new Pr t model and the experimental data.…”
Section: A New Local Turbulent Prandtl Number Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jaeger et al (Jaeger et al, 2015) summarized the flow and heat transfer experiments of the liquid metal in narrow rectangular channels, which are reflected in a review. Research suggests that a aspect ratio of 10 can be used as a boundary for dividing the heat transfer characteristics of narrow rectangular channels, and two empirical formulas for predicting Nu have been proposed, which are applicable to different aspect ratio ranges (Sineath, 1949;Tidball, 1953;Duchatelle and Vautrey, 1964;Crye et al, 2002). Takahashi et al (Takahashi et al, 1998) studied the pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of lithium single-phase fluid in a simple horizontally heated rectangular channel under a horizontal transverse magnetic field in a lithium cooled magnetic confinement fusion reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%