Measurement of the inclusive<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">*</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>cross section above the Υ(4<i>S</i>)

Akerib, D. S.; Barish, B. C.; Cowen, D. F.; Eigen, G.; Stroynowski, R.; Urheim, J.; Weinstein, A. J.; Morrison, R. J.; Schmidt, D.; Procario, M.; Johnson, D.; Lingel, K.; Rankin, P.; Smith, J. G.; Alexander, J. P.; Bebek, C.; Berkelman, K.; Besson, D.; Browder, T. E.; Cassel, D. G.; Cheu, E.; Coffman, D. M.; Drell, P. S.; Ehrlich, R.; Galik, R. S.; Garcia-Sciveres, M.; Geiser, B.; Gittelman, B.; Gray, S. W.; Hartill, D. L.; Heltsley, B. K.; Honscheid, K.; Kandaswamy, J.; Katayama, N.; Kreinick, D. L.; Lewis, J. D.; Ludwig, G. S.; Masui, J.; Mevissen, J.; Mistry, N. B.; Nandi, S.; Ng, C. R.; Nordberg, E.; O’Grady, C. P.; Patterson, J. R.; Peterson, D.; Pisharody, M.; Riley, D.; Sapper, M.; Selen, M.; Worden, H. M.; Worris, M.; Avery, P.; Freyberger, A.; Rodriguez, J. L.; Yelton, J.; Kinoshita, K.; Pipkin, F. M.; Wilson, Richard; Wolinski, J.; Xiao, D.; Sadoff, A. J.; Ammar, R.; Baringer, P.; Coppage, D.; Davis, R.; Haas, P.; Kelly, M. P.; Kwak, N.; Lam, H.; Ro, S. R.; Kubota, Y.; Nelson, J. K.; Perticone, D.; Poling, R.; Schrenk, S.; Alam, M. S.; Kim, I. J.; Nemati, B.; Romero, V.; Sun, C. R.; Wang, P. N.; Zoeller, M. M.; Crawford, G.; Fulton, R.; Gan, K. K.; Jensen, T.; Kagan, H.; Kass, R.; Malchow, R.; Morrow, F.; Whitmore, J.; Wilson, P.; Butler, F.; Fu, X.; Kalbfleisch, G.; Lambrecht, M.; Skubic, P.; Snow, J.; Wang, P. L.; Bortoletto, D.; Brown, D. N.; Dominick, J.; McIlwain, R. L.; Miller, D. H.; Modesitt, M.; Shibata, E. I.; Schaffner, S. F.; Shipsey, I. P. J.; Battle, M.; Kroha, H.; Sparks, K.; Thorndike, E. H.; Wang, C. H.; Artuso, M.; Goldberg, M.; Haupt, T.; Horwitz, N.; Jain, V.; Kennett, R.; Moneti, G. C.; Rozen, Y.; Rubin, P. D.; Skwarnicki, T.; Stone, S.; Thusalidas, M.; Yao, Wei-Ming; Zhu, G.; Barnes, A. V.; Bartelt, J.; Csorna, S. E.; Letson, T.; Mestayer, M. D.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1692

Cited by 31 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The moment is split into the contribution due to the six Υ resonances and the open bb continuum. The main uncertainty comes from the rather poor knowledge of the latter, which we parametrize as R cont bb = 0.4 ± 0.2 [19]. Since the continuum contribution is suppressed for larger values of n, resulting in a smaller experimental error, we refrain from using n < 6.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Renormalization-group improved sum rule analysis for the bottom-quark mass

Pineda

Signer

2006

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We study the effect of resumming large logarithms in the determination of the bottom quark mass through a non-relativistic sum rule analysis. Our result is complete at next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy and includes some known contributions at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. Compared to finite order computations, the reliability of the theoretical evaluation is greatly improved, resulting in a substantially reduced scale dependence and a faster convergent perturbative series. This allows us to significantly improve over previous determinations of the MS bottom quark mass, m b , from non-relativistic sum rules. Our final figure reads m b (m b ) = 4.19 ± 0.06 GeV.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Renormalization-group improved sum rule analysis for the bottom-quark mass

Pineda

Signer

2006

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The masses and leptonic widths of the resonances are taken from [18]. Very little information exists on the bb continuum above s = (10.56 GeV) 2 [19]. We parametrize the continuum by setting R cont.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The bottom quark mass from sum rules at next-to-next-to-leading order

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We determine the bottom MS quark mass m b and the quark mass in the potential subtraction scheme from moments of the bb production cross section and from the mass of the Upsilon 1S state at next-to-next-to-leading order in a reorganized perturbative expansion that sums Coulomb exchange to all orders. We find m b (m b ) = (4.25 ± 0.08) GeV and m b,PS (2 GeV) = (4.59 ± 0.08) GeV for the potential-subtracted mass at the scale 2 GeV, adopting a conservative error estimate.

show abstract

“…, which is produced for B mesons by Υ(5S) resonance with some branch ratio 10-12 and above Υ(4s) resonance. 13 Although physically a single meson cannot be in a CP eigenstate |M ± because of CP violation, the entangled states can be exactly written in terms of |M ± , this makes the expression |M ± (t) and the decay amplitudes Q ± and X ± meaningful and useful.…”

Section: Entangled Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Pseudoscalar neutral mesons are copiously generated as pairs entangled in the flavor space. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] CP and CPT violating parameters can be measured by studying the joint decays of entangled meson pairs. [1][2][3][4]7,12,14,15 This provides a venue of searching standard model extension.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%