2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00646-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the intrinsic mechanical loss of low-loss samples using a nodal support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we will assume that the loss angles associated with energy stored in strains parallel to the plane of the coating are all equal. This assumption is motivated by the observation that many isotropic, amorphous materials, like fused silica, do not show significantly different quality factors for many modes even though the relative magnitude of the various terms in the elastic energy varies significantly between the modes [18]. The measurements made at Glasgow and Stanford Universities further strengthen this assumption [15] -those measurements show no significant variation of the coating loss as the relative size of the different coating energy terms changes from mode to mode.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we will assume that the loss angles associated with energy stored in strains parallel to the plane of the coating are all equal. This assumption is motivated by the observation that many isotropic, amorphous materials, like fused silica, do not show significantly different quality factors for many modes even though the relative magnitude of the various terms in the elastic energy varies significantly between the modes [18]. The measurements made at Glasgow and Stanford Universities further strengthen this assumption [15] -those measurements show no significant variation of the coating loss as the relative size of the different coating energy terms changes from mode to mode.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the low CTE materials that are commonly used in ultra-stable cavities, ULE has a Q factor of 6.1 × 10 4 that is more than one order of magnitude larger than that of Zerodur (3.1 × 10 3 ). Furthermore, FS has an even larger Q factor of about 10 6 [35]. In cases where thermal noise limits are the ultimate limiting factor of achievable cavity stability, it is very effective to use a higher Q factor material (like FS) as mirror substrate while keeping ULE as spacer material.…”
Section: Calculation Of Thermal Noise Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Properties of sapphire as a cryogenic substrate material have been studied by several groups [87,[109][110][111] suggesting that sapphire has a very low mechanical loss. At cryogenic temperatures it reaches 2 × 10 −10 [87].…”
Section: Sapphirementioning
confidence: 99%