2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00311-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the mechanical loss of crystalline samples using a nodal support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 This mode has a Q value of 6.8ϫ 10 5 , for an fQ product of 6.8ϫ 10 12 Hz, of the same order as previously demonstrated with much larger lower frequency singlecrystal bulk resonators 15 and within a factor of ϳ2 -3 of that attained with higher frequency micromechanical systems. The 10.02 MHz mode of a 325-m-long device was measured shortly after a hot-plate bake step which has previously been observed to lead to moderate improvements in quality factor for similar devices.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 This mode has a Q value of 6.8ϫ 10 5 , for an fQ product of 6.8ϫ 10 12 Hz, of the same order as previously demonstrated with much larger lower frequency singlecrystal bulk resonators 15 and within a factor of ϳ2 -3 of that attained with higher frequency micromechanical systems. The 10.02 MHz mode of a 325-m-long device was measured shortly after a hot-plate bake step which has previously been observed to lead to moderate improvements in quality factor for similar devices.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…[12][13][14] Whereas macroscopic audiofrequency oscillators have been reported with Q as high as 10 8 at room temperature, 15 devices with cross sections on the order of 100 nm tend to exhibit Q well below 10 5 . For this application there is an advantage to achieving maximum quality factor as well as frequency, while minimizing device size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of intrinsic and expected thermo-elastic dissipation in silicon is broadly comparable to sapphire at room temperature [8]. However on cooling the linear thermal expansion coefficient of silicon becomes zero at two temperatures, ~125 K and ~18 K [9], and thus around these two temperatures thermoelastic dissipation could be expected to be negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, in order to further reduce the thermal noise level cooling is a very promising option. In this case, crystalline materials, as silicon or sapphire, are promising candidates due to their excellent low mechanical losses [15], [16] and high thermal conductivity [17] at cryogenic temperatures. These materials are non-isotropic in nature and thus the strategy to determine thermal noise as described above needs to be reviewed.…”
Section: Thermal Noise Of Optical Components In Interferometric mentioning
confidence: 99%