2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.012510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the5D-level polarizability in laser-cooled Rb atoms

Abstract: We report on accurate measurements of the scalar αS and tensor αT polarizabilities of the 5D fine structure levels 5D 3/2 and 5D 5/2 in Rb. The measured values (in atomic units) αS(5D 3/2 ) = 18400(75), αT (5D 3/2 ) = −750(30), αS(5D 5/2 ) = 18600(76) and αT (5D 5/2 ) = −1440(60) show reasonable correspondence to previously published theoretical predictions, but are more accurate. We implemented laser excitation of the 5D level in a laser cooled cloud of optically polarized Rb-87 atoms placed in a constant ele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, even for the first excited state of hydrogen atom, the ratio of the fairly recent numerical quantum Monte Carlo polarizability estimate [138] to the analytical value by McDowell (1976) [136] reaches the value of 1.4. At once, for 5D 3/2 and 5D 5/2 levels of atomic Rb, the discrepancy between the results of analytical calculations [137] and magneto-optical trapping measurements [99] is about 10%. For molecules, the inconsistency in data from different sources can be even greater.…”
Section: Assembling the Data Set For Excited State Polarizabilities 2...mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, even for the first excited state of hydrogen atom, the ratio of the fairly recent numerical quantum Monte Carlo polarizability estimate [138] to the analytical value by McDowell (1976) [136] reaches the value of 1.4. At once, for 5D 3/2 and 5D 5/2 levels of atomic Rb, the discrepancy between the results of analytical calculations [137] and magneto-optical trapping measurements [99] is about 10%. For molecules, the inconsistency in data from different sources can be even greater.…”
Section: Assembling the Data Set For Excited State Polarizabilities 2...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To begin with, the results of analytical [136,137] and numerical [106,138] calculations for H, C, N, O, Na, Si, P, S, and K atoms supplemented with recent experimental data for atomic Rb [99] were involved for this purpose. Then, we included in the fit data set the results of quantum chemical calculations performed under various multireference approximations for a number of small and medium-sized molecules (H 2 , C 2 , OH, CO, N 2 , O 2 , H 2 O, HO 2 , H 2 S, O 3 , CH 2 O, C 2 H 4 , acetone) [16,24,93,104,108,109,132,133,[139][140][141] and by using the EOM-CC approach for several quite large heterocyclic compounds (pyrimidine, s-tetrazine, uracil, and pnitroaniline).…”
Section: Assembling the Data Set For Excited State Polarizabilities 2...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where P (x) = 1−1/x+1/x 2 , Q(x) = −1+3/x−3/x 2 , Γ 0 is the decay rate of the excited stated of an isolated atom, r jn = r j − r n , d ejmgj = J e m|D j |J g 0 , and ∆ = δ/Γ 0 is the dimensionless Stark shift. Values of ∆ ∼ 1 are typical for existing experiments with clouds of cold atoms in external electric fields for field intensities of the order of several kV/cm [24]. However, much stronger fields (up to 400 kV/cm) were previously used to study Stark effect in hot atomic beams [25].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1 may become significant. While no theoretical or experimental estimate has been made for the 5D 3/2 dynamic polarizability, the static polarizabilities have been investigated [11][12][13][14], as well as the dynamic polarizability at 778.1 nm for 5D 5/2 [15].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%