2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.97.082004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of thett¯Production Cross Section inpp¯Collisions ats

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross section for this process has been calculated as 6.77 ± 0.42 pb for a top mass at 175 GeV [71]. The tt system has been extensively studied at the Tevatron and the measured cross section in all decay channels agrees well with theory [19,14,16,15,25,26,27,24,31,30]. The leading order Feynman diagrams for tt production are shown in 2 In Eq.…”
Section: The Top Quarksupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The cross section for this process has been calculated as 6.77 ± 0.42 pb for a top mass at 175 GeV [71]. The tt system has been extensively studied at the Tevatron and the measured cross section in all decay channels agrees well with theory [19,14,16,15,25,26,27,24,31,30]. The leading order Feynman diagrams for tt production are shown in 2 In Eq.…”
Section: The Top Quarksupporting
confidence: 50%
“…To predict the number of events for each type of background, we used the same method as was used by the top production cross-section measurement in L+J channel [76].…”
Section: Background Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted number of the signal and background expectations obtained from the cross-section analysis [76] already contains the systematic uncertainties. However the MC modeling of the geometrical and kinematic acceptance includes the effects of parton distribution functions (PDFs), initial and final state radiation (ISR and FSR) and jet energy scale which are sources of the systematic uncertainty.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We summarize the systematic uncertainties of backgrounds in both the single lepton and di-lepton signatures (the terms The method of predicting misidentified heavy flavor (mistag rates) by applying a parameterization of the rate for a light-quark jet or gluon jet being mis-identified as jet from a a charm or bottom quark to jets in a sample before heavy flavor identification contributes a significant systematic uncertainty to the background estimates. We vary the mistag probability calculated by the standard CDF algorithm used in the measurement of the top quark cross-section [58] jet-by-jet by ±15 % (i.e. a factor of 0.85 or 1.15) to estimate the contribution to the uncertainty.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertainties Of the Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%