2016
DOI: 10.3807/josk.2016.20.3.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Modulation Transfer Function of Infrared Imaging System by Modified Slant Edge Method

Abstract: The performance of a staring infrared imaging system can be characterized based on estimating the modulation transfer function (MTF). The slant edge method is a widely used MTF estimation method, which can effectively solve the aliasing problem caused by the discrete undersampling of the infrared focal plane array. However, the traditional slant edge method has some limitations such as the low precision of the edge angle extraction and using the approximate function to fit the edge spread function (ESF), which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further improvements can be made by adjusting the standard algorithm, but at the cost of moving away from the ISO method. For example, adjusting the ESF resampling process to better conform to the projection down the edge slope was shown to improve the e-SFR measure in multiple studies [29,30,40,41]. These studies provided results with reduced bias introduced by image noise, edge angle variations and ROI size variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further improvements can be made by adjusting the standard algorithm, but at the cost of moving away from the ISO method. For example, adjusting the ESF resampling process to better conform to the projection down the edge slope was shown to improve the e-SFR measure in multiple studies [29,30,40,41]. These studies provided results with reduced bias introduced by image noise, edge angle variations and ROI size variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pixel sizes for the two sensors did not match, the number of pixels in the ROI was selected so that the data from both sensors covered the same physical dimensions on the object. The angle of the slanted edge was calculated from the ROI using a combination of gradient [4], edge detection, and line fitting. This process accounted for any misalignment between the imaging sensor and the object in the experimental setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step is important because a difference of less than one degree can have adverse effects on the outcome of the MTF calculation. After the angle was determined, the pixels in the ROI were projected onto a new coordinate system, rotated so that the y-axis was parallel to the edge [4]. This projection (figure 6) is how the up-sampling of the ESF occurs, creating a super-sampled ESF without interpolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detector board Americium source A standard approach to determine a detectors resolution is the slanted edge method [16], where part of the detector is covered with an object at a lower angle [17,15]. As an edge, we used a 1 mm thick Palladium plate placed about 1 cm above the detector surface and slanted by ca.…”
Section: Readout System Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%