2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.91.152302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Neutron Lifetime Using a Proton Trap

Abstract: We report a new measurement of the neutron decay lifetime by the absolute counting of in-beam neutrons and their decay protons. Protons were confined in a quasi-Penning trap and counted with a silicon detector. The neutron beam fluence was measured by capture in a thin 6LiF foil detector with known absolute efficiency. The combination of these simultaneous measurements gives the neutron lifetime: tau(n)=(886.8+/-1.2[stat]+/-3.2[syst]) s. The systematic uncertainty is dominated by uncertainties in the mass of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing tension between the latter, "in beam" experiments and the former, "bottle" experiments [17,22] -though there is also tension between the results of the most precise bottle experiments [17,22] -make the observation intriguing. However, the most precise in-beam neutron lifetime experiment [61,62] counts decay protons, rather than electrons, so that our numerical analysis is not directly relevant. Indeed, in such experiments, there are no threshold effects, and the entire proton recoil spectrum is empirically accessible [61,62].…”
Section: Formalism For Neutron β-Decay Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existing tension between the latter, "in beam" experiments and the former, "bottle" experiments [17,22] -though there is also tension between the results of the most precise bottle experiments [17,22] -make the observation intriguing. However, the most precise in-beam neutron lifetime experiment [61,62] counts decay protons, rather than electrons, so that our numerical analysis is not directly relevant. Indeed, in such experiments, there are no threshold effects, and the entire proton recoil spectrum is empirically accessible [61,62].…”
Section: Formalism For Neutron β-Decay Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most precise in-beam neutron lifetime experiment [61,62] counts decay protons, rather than electrons, so that our numerical analysis is not directly relevant. Indeed, in such experiments, there are no threshold effects, and the entire proton recoil spectrum is empirically accessible [61,62]. On the other hand, experimental concepts which detect the decay electrons have been under development [63,64].…”
Section: Formalism For Neutron β-Decay Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper describes a measurement of the neutron lifetime by counting beam neutrons and trapped protons [9]. It presents a refined analysis of the data and treatment of the systematic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] [7] [ 9] beam UCN bottle Storage ring Neutron decay can be used to determine the CKM matrix element |V ud | with high precision in a fashion that is free of some of the theoretical uncertainties present in 0 + → 0 + nuclear decays, which are still used for the most precise determination of |V ud |. Neutron decay is the system that offers the best prospect of a significant improvement in the direct determination of |V ud |.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was mainly due to the difficulty in determining the experimental systematics involved in the various experiments. But since that time experiments have improved to yield accuracies as low as in the 0.1% range [17]- [24]. This yielded a 2004 world average of [8] τ n = (885.7 ± 0.8) s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%