2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Quantum Tunneling Gap in a Dysprosocenium Single-Molecule Magnet

Abstract: We perform magnetization sweeps on the high-performing single-molecule magnet [Dy­(Cpttt)2]­[B­(C6F5)4] (Cpttt = C5H2 t Bu3-1,2,4; t Bu = C­(CH3)3) to determine the quantum tunneling gap of the ground-state avoided crossing at zero-field, finding a value on the order of 10–7 cm–1. In addition to the pure crystalline material, we also measure the tunnel splitting of [Dy­(Cpttt)2]­[B­(C6F5)4] dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM) and 1,2-difluorobenzene (DFB). We find that concentrations of 200 or 100 mM [Dy­(Cpt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S14 †). [83][84][85] Consequently, the α values, which determine the width of the distribution of relaxation times at 1000 Oe and HF at 3000 Oe, appear within a small range (Tables S5 and S6, † α < 0.3), supporting a single relaxation process. However, the α values at LF below 3000 Oe and above 2.2 K were high owing to the disappearance of their peaks at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Dynamic Magnetic Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…S14 †). [83][84][85] Consequently, the α values, which determine the width of the distribution of relaxation times at 1000 Oe and HF at 3000 Oe, appear within a small range (Tables S5 and S6, † α < 0.3), supporting a single relaxation process. However, the α values at LF below 3000 Oe and above 2.2 K were high owing to the disappearance of their peaks at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Dynamic Magnetic Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The magnetic relaxation times (τ) for [Co(hfac) 2 L] n were obtained by simultaneous fitting of χ′ and χ″ frequency dependencies using the generalized Debye model. 56,57 The relaxation times follow an Arrhenius thermal activation behaviour τ −1 = τ 0 −1 •exp(−Δτ/T ) with an activation energy barrier of Δτ = 190(20) cm −1 and τ 0 = 10 −11 -10 −12 s (Fig. 5d).…”
Section: Dalton Transactions Papermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…14,33,35 The causes of transverse magnetic anisotropy can be molecular vibrations, spin−spin and spin−nuclear coupling with the neighboring magnetic centers. 33,34 The slight variation of the Dy−Dy distances with external pressure can also influence the dipolar fields around a Dy center and consequently the QTM relaxation times. 21 To determine the variation of QTM relaxation times arising from changes in the effective dipolar field, or due to something more intrinsic, we have performed classical simulations of the dipolar magnetic field at each pressure point.…”
Section: ■ Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among Dy­(III) SMMs, even though QTM is forbidden between isolated KDs by Kramers theorem of time-reversal symmetry, transverse magnetic anisotropy can introduce interstate mixing and facilitate magnetic relaxation via QTM. Hence QTM is a primary factor that determines the SMM behavior of Dy­(III) SMMs that show lower blocking temperatures than what is expected from their high U eff values. ,, The causes of transverse magnetic anisotropy can be molecular vibrations, spin–spin and spin–nuclear coupling with the neighboring magnetic centers. , The slight variation of the Dy–Dy distances with external pressure can also influence the dipolar fields around a Dy center and consequently the QTM relaxation times . To determine the variation of QTM relaxation times arising from changes in the effective dipolar field, or due to something more intrinsic, we have performed classical simulations of the dipolar magnetic field at each pressure point.…”
Section: Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%