2014
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/25/10/105001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the roughness of nano-scale surfaces, both unannealed and with limited anneal, by atomic force microscopy

Abstract: The roughness and bias measured for surfaces scanned by a parabolic atomic-force microscope tip are analyzed computationally for surfaces exhibiting a random, Gaussian population of heights, uncorrelated from pixel to pixel. The fraction of the surface with which the probe is in contact is then analyzed in detail to show the area fraction of the surface that is, in practice, contacted within a defined tolerance. This shows that it is very difficult to measure much of these surfaces for any significant roughnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We match the gradients, and if σ M is 4 nm, we may deduce that σ R is about 2.5 nm and σ 1 about 3 nm, i.e., the long wavelength roughness is slightly smaller than σ 1 . This is what we would expect for the random form of the roughness formed in sputtered surfaces 28 rather than the traditional self-affine fractals of engineered surfaces. 29 As shown in Figures 3 and 8 in the study of mixtures by Seah et al 25 the lower the composition, the greater the intensity enhancement at any given positive Ξ value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We match the gradients, and if σ M is 4 nm, we may deduce that σ R is about 2.5 nm and σ 1 about 3 nm, i.e., the long wavelength roughness is slightly smaller than σ 1 . This is what we would expect for the random form of the roughness formed in sputtered surfaces 28 rather than the traditional self-affine fractals of engineered surfaces. 29 As shown in Figures 3 and 8 in the study of mixtures by Seah et al 25 the lower the composition, the greater the intensity enhancement at any given positive Ξ value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We match the gradients, and if σ M is 4 nm, we may deduce that σ R is about 2.5 nm and σ 1 about 3 nm, i.e., the long wavelength roughness is slightly smaller than σ 1 . This is what we would expect for the random form of the roughness formed in sputtered surfaces rather than the traditional self-affine fractals of engineered surfaces …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Green et al [13] showed gross amounts of dewetting can occur for Irganox 1010 films less than 5 nm thick after 13 days at room temperature, whereas phenylalanine seemed very stable over longer periods at this thickness [14]. In more recent work, Seah [15] calculates that significant molecular movement by surface diffusion is possible for some organic materials at room temperature. This is, of course, not wanted in most analytical situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, under such discretization, physical presence of roughness with higher spatial frequencies can cause distortion of spatial frequencies spectra retrieved from the image, which is so called aliasing. To prevent this, we used AFM cantilevers with tip radius 100 nm serving as a high-frequencies filter [15]. Such a tip radius is quite large for AFM, and we made additional measurements to show that convolution effects do not distort the image in the frequency range of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%