2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2017.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the volume-backscattering spectrum from an aggregation of Antarctic krill and inference of their length-frequency distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ability to discriminate between different categories of organisms (e.g. Urmy et al (2012)), newer multi-frequency (Brierley et al, 1998;Kloser et al, 2002) and broadband (Amakasu and Mukai, 2017;Lavery et al, 2010;Ross et al, 2013) sonar systems exploit variations in echo intensity with frequency to discriminate categories, sizes and even species of pelagic organisms (McQuinn et al 2013). For ship-borne sonar this quantification becomes increasingly coarse with depth due to beam spreading and acoustic attenuation of the high frequencies needed to study small organisms.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ability to discriminate between different categories of organisms (e.g. Urmy et al (2012)), newer multi-frequency (Brierley et al, 1998;Kloser et al, 2002) and broadband (Amakasu and Mukai, 2017;Lavery et al, 2010;Ross et al, 2013) sonar systems exploit variations in echo intensity with frequency to discriminate categories, sizes and even species of pelagic organisms (McQuinn et al 2013). For ship-borne sonar this quantification becomes increasingly coarse with depth due to beam spreading and acoustic attenuation of the high frequencies needed to study small organisms.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two frequency comparisons were needed to calculate the differences in MVBS values generated from the backscatter of the same object. The process was done in order to distinguish the effect of frequency variability, which eventually can determine the dominant scatterers [29]. The difference in MVBS values for each ADCP instrument is written as:…”
Section: Mvbs Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%