1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(97)00049-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of three-dimensional permeability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[Pa·s] the fluid viscosity of the injected fluid and the term "p/"x [Pa/m] expresses the pressure drop to a specific flow length. Three different kinds of experimental methods of permeability measurements are wellknown: 1D flow [13][14][15][16], 2D flow [13,17,18] and 3D flow [19][20][21][22]. Nowadays no defined standard requirements for permeability measurements and calculation procedures are available [23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Pa·s] the fluid viscosity of the injected fluid and the term "p/"x [Pa/m] expresses the pressure drop to a specific flow length. Three different kinds of experimental methods of permeability measurements are wellknown: 1D flow [13][14][15][16], 2D flow [13,17,18] and 3D flow [19][20][21][22]. Nowadays no defined standard requirements for permeability measurements and calculation procedures are available [23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, the flow close to the inlet is hemispherical; an approach to compensate for this discrepancy is to assume that z 0 R 0 [3], or that z 0 R 0 /10 [2,6], where R 0 is the inlet radius. An alternative is the usage of an additional transformation (Eq.…”
Section: Modeling Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In systems built specifically to detect the unsaturated permeability, sensors that detect the flow advancement are essential but are the source of yet another uncertainty; their performance and efficiency in flow front detection is bound to define the quality of the permeability calculation. When in the past the transverse flow front was detected by material-embedded sensors [2][3][4] (e.g., thermistors, optical fibers, or SMARTweave TM ), the flow was affected by the sensors in a degree proportional to their diameter and orientation [5] while only spatially discrete measurements could be achieved. Electrical resistance point sensors that invade only the tool and not the material can only provide fluid arrival information at the cavity transverse boundaries and therefore a model is needed for intermediate transverse positions [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• through-thickness flow with constant pressure [11,5] or constant flow rate [12,13]; • three dimensional flows [14][15][16].…”
Section: Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%