1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2275(97)00099-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of time constants for superconducting cables with Hall probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The losses per cycle therefore decrease weaker at higher frequencies. Some measurements indicate this [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Our results are obtained by the analogy with the induced currents in normal metals.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The losses per cycle therefore decrease weaker at higher frequencies. Some measurements indicate this [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Our results are obtained by the analogy with the induced currents in normal metals.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…(b) We noticed also that the results differ from those when the normal layer is only on one side of the superconducting cable. In the latter case, there is a double peak in the frequency dependence of the losses per cycle [26]. We did not see any tendency for this effect in our case.…”
Section: Commentscontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…In this rapid rampdown process, the temperature of the conductor rises due to both AC losses and Joule losses in the normal zone. The AC loss power density is estimated by using the observed time constant of the screening currents between strands in the conductor [17]. The experimentally obtained resistivity of the stabilizer is used to give the temperature dependent Joule losses.…”
Section: Operation Of Helical Coil and Quench Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b is the cable width and c the layer thickness between the upper and lower strands. For other field directions, the inclusion of the corresponding demagnetization factor should be performed [20][21][22]. (Please note also the slightly different factors for flat cables in the papers cited above; the reasons for these differences are not always clear [23].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%