1961
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/77/2/322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Townsend's Ionization Coefficients and Attachment Coefficients in Oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
25
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at E/p""'" 10. Prasad and Craggs (1961) have shown that for a Druyvesteyn distribution of velocities the data obtained in swarm-type experiments by H.C.B., C.P.B., Doehring, and Prasad and Craggs were in better agreement with the data from the beam experiments of Craggs, Thorburn, and Tozer (1957) and of Buchel'nikova (1959) than were the results of other swarm experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…at E/p""'" 10. Prasad and Craggs (1961) have shown that for a Druyvesteyn distribution of velocities the data obtained in swarm-type experiments by H.C.B., C.P.B., Doehring, and Prasad and Craggs were in better agreement with the data from the beam experiments of Craggs, Thorburn, and Tozer (1957) and of Buchel'nikova (1959) than were the results of other swarm experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Prasad and Craggs 1961;Rees 1964;Rees and Jory 1964) have shown discrepancies no greater than might be expected as a result of imprecise knowledge of the appropriate energy distributions, the comparisons for water vapour (Prasad and Craggs 1960) were a notable exception. For this gas, values of ua calculated from swarm experiments exceeded the corresponding values calculated from Buchel'nikova's data by a factor of 5 in some instances.…”
Section: Comparison Of Attachment Data From Beam and Swarm Experimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…10 presents the comparison of the calculated attachment coefficient in pure O 2 with the literature data. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] At relatively low E/N (below 20Td), a deviation between the calculated results and Grünberg's data 35 can be observed, which may be because of the adopted cross section data for the 3-body attachment. However, at relatively high E/N, the calculated data drown in the literature results.…”
Section: B Ionization and Attachment Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 93%