2018
DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering2020019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bubble Columns

Abstract: Abstract:The paper presents a brief overview of experiments on volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. The available experimental data published are often incomparable due to the different type of gas distributor and different operating conditions used by various authors. Moreover, the value of the coefficient obtained experimentally is very sensitive to the particular method and to the physical models used in its evaluation. It follows that the Dynamic Pressure Method (DPM) is able to provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature values for k sol and k fre span large ranges that cover our best-fit parameters. Comparison of best-fit k sol and k fre indicates O 2 reacts more quickly with free compared to solid phase Fe­(II), in agreement with trends for O 2 reacting with aqueous Fe 2+ versus reduced nontronite reported by Zeng et al Literature values for k oe span a relatively small range (0.001 to 0.06 s –1 , Table S3), and the value depends on the degree of sample mixing. Our value is relatively small because sample bottles were gently oscillated at 220 rpm on a shaker, while samples were rapidly mixed in prior work.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Literature values for k sol and k fre span large ranges that cover our best-fit parameters. Comparison of best-fit k sol and k fre indicates O 2 reacts more quickly with free compared to solid phase Fe­(II), in agreement with trends for O 2 reacting with aqueous Fe 2+ versus reduced nontronite reported by Zeng et al Literature values for k oe span a relatively small range (0.001 to 0.06 s –1 , Table S3), and the value depends on the degree of sample mixing. Our value is relatively small because sample bottles were gently oscillated at 220 rpm on a shaker, while samples were rapidly mixed in prior work.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…and liquid properties (viscosity, presence of ions inhibiting coalescence, or surfactants adsorption, etc.) [29,30]. Regarding the specific effect of surfactants, it is reflected in the increase in the bubble drag force coefficient and the decrease in the bubble rise velocity since these substances tend to accumulate at the bubble gas−liquid interfaces [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solartechnik GmbH, Heiligenstadt, Germany) set to a constant temperature (varying among the experiments as described in Section 3) and 12 h light per day. We have not measured oxygen concentration in growth medium because the concentration within in the bulk of hairy roots is likely to vary with the location of the probe and accurate methods for the determination of volumetric mass transfer coefficient, such as a rapid switch between input gases with different oxygen concentrations or the dynamic pressure method [58], were beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Operation Of the Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%