2019
DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement properties and implications of the Brief Resilience Scale in healthy workers

Abstract: Objectives The aim of this study was to study measurement properties of the Dutch Language Version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS‐DLV) in blue and white collar workers employed at multiple companies and to compare the validity and factor structure to other language versions. Methods Workers (n = 1023) were assessed during a cross‐sectional health surveillance. Construct validity was tested with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) and hypothesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BRS had a good internal consistency, with a coefficient alpha of 0.71. This result is consistent with the alpha values (ranging from 0.71 to 0.85) reported in other BRS validation studies of workers, university students and patients with cancer or heart conditions in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the United States [1,[18][19][20][21][22]. In contrast, the results for the BRCS indicated a poor Cronbach's alpha value (0.59).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The BRS had a good internal consistency, with a coefficient alpha of 0.71. This result is consistent with the alpha values (ranging from 0.71 to 0.85) reported in other BRS validation studies of workers, university students and patients with cancer or heart conditions in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the United States [1,[18][19][20][21][22]. In contrast, the results for the BRCS indicated a poor Cronbach's alpha value (0.59).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, the sampling method and sample size for this study were the same as those in the original study. The results of this study also replicated the results of previous BRS studies (e.g., the structure with two latent factors and Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.85), including those with samples from clinical settings [17][18][19][20][21][22]24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations