2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The included instruments are categorized into three categories of recommendations: (A) instruments that have the potential to be recommended as the most suitable instrument for the construct and population of interest (i.e., instruments with evidence for sufficient content validity (any level) and at least low evidence for sufficient internal consistency); (B) instruments that may have the potential to be recommended, but further validation studies are needed (i.e., instruments categorized not in A or C) and (C) instruments that should not be recommended (i.e., instruments with high‐quality evidence for an insufficient measurement property; de Freitas et al, 2022 ; Prinsen et al, 2018 ). The step is formulated concerning the quality of the evidence, construct of interest and study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included instruments are categorized into three categories of recommendations: (A) instruments that have the potential to be recommended as the most suitable instrument for the construct and population of interest (i.e., instruments with evidence for sufficient content validity (any level) and at least low evidence for sufficient internal consistency); (B) instruments that may have the potential to be recommended, but further validation studies are needed (i.e., instruments categorized not in A or C) and (C) instruments that should not be recommended (i.e., instruments with high‐quality evidence for an insufficient measurement property; de Freitas et al, 2022 ; Prinsen et al, 2018 ). The step is formulated concerning the quality of the evidence, construct of interest and study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheelchair mobility in performing quick-turning, forward, and reverse patterns is paramount to optimal performance in WB ( De Freitas et al, 2023 ). While proper muscular and aerobic training is critical to ensure optimal gameplay, ergonomic factors of the wheelchair can impact mobility significantly and should be carefully tailored to each athlete.…”
Section: Wheelchair Biomechanics Kinematics and Ergonomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheelchair type and build should also take impairment level into account ( Veeger et al, 2019 ). The frame, front wheels, backrest, footrest, antitip mechanism, rear axle, and main wheels are the essential components of a WB wheelchair ( De Freitas et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Wheelchair Biomechanics Kinematics and Ergonomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation