Measurement properties of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Patello-Femoral questionnaire in Saudi Arabians

Ateef, Mahamed

doi:10.7717/peerj.9323

Cited by 13 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, regarding reliability, the Arabic translation had an ICC of 0.96 14 , which was better than our ICC of 0.82. This difference in the intraclass correlation coe cient could be explained by the timing between the rst and second questionnaires being administered to participants, with intervals of 48 hours in the former study and 7 days in the latter one.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis Subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

Martinez-Cano

Vernaza-Obando

Chica

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patellofemoral pain is a very common complaint in orthopedic sports medicine clinics. Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are useful for research and clinical practice; thus, it is important to have validated translations available for new PROMs. This study aims to translate and validate the Spanish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS-PF).Methods: The KOOS-PF was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish following current guidelines, which included translation, back-translation, conciliation and pilot studies. Patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis from one medical center were invited to participate and complete the questionnaire. The evaluation of the score included internal consistency (Cronbach´s alpha), floor and ceiling effects, measurement error, minimal detectable change and minimal important change. For test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used, and for responsiveness, the global rating of change (GROC) scale was measured one month later.Results: Sixty patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis were included in the study. The Spanish version showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.93) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.82). Responsiveness was confirmed, with the KOOS-PF demonstrating a strong correlation with the GROC score (r 0.64). The minimal detectable change was 11.1 points, the minimal important change was 17.2 points, and there were no floor or ceiling effects for the score.Conclusions: The Spanish version of the KOOS-PF demonstrated very good measurement properties, including internal consistency, reliability and responsiveness. The KOOS-PF can be used in Spanish-speaking patients for clinical and research purposes in patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.Trial registration: Fundación Valle del Lili, Biomedical Research Ethical Committee: No. 01438.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 80%

“…Additionally, similar results were found in a validation of the scale translated to Arabic. While our internal consistency was very good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93, Ateef 14 reported a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis Subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

Martinez-Cano

Vernaza-Obando

Chica

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, similar results were found in the validation of the Arabic version. While our internal consistency was very good, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93, Ateef [ 14 ] reported a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81. However, regarding reliability, the Arabic translation had an ICC of 0.96 [ 14 ], which was better than our ICC of 0.82.…”

Section: Main Textmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…While our internal consistency was very good, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93, Ateef [ 14 ] reported a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81. However, regarding reliability, the Arabic translation had an ICC of 0.96 [ 14 ], which was better than our ICC of 0.82. This difference in the intraclass correlation coefficient could be explained by the timing between the first and second questionnaires administration, with intervals of 48-h in the former study and 7-days in the latter one.…”

Section: Main Textmentioning

confidence: 72%

Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Spanish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to translate to Spanish the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS-PF) and validate this Spanish version of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patellofemoral pain. Results The KOOS-PF was translated to Spanish and sixty patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis accepted to complete the questionnaire. 1-week later 58 patients answered the questions again for the test–retest reliability validation and finally 55 patients completed 1-month later for the responsiveness assessment. The Spanish version showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.93) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.82). Responsiveness was confirmed, showing a strong correlation with the global rating of change (GROC) score (r 0.64). The minimal detectable change was 11.1 points, the minimal important change was 17.2 points, and there were no floor or ceiling effects for the score.

show abstract

“…A total of 20 articles were selected for this review; out of which 12 articles were from Saudi Arabia [ 1 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], two each from Morocco [ 36 , 37 ], Egypt [ 38 , 39 ], and Jordan [ 40 , 41 ], and one each from Tunisia [ 14 ], and Kuwait [ 42 ]. A total of 10 knee-related outcome measures were cross-culturally adapted, and their psychometric measurement properties were evaluated in the Arabic language.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the previous two decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been well tested, and the tools were validated in different languages across the globe. This systematic review aimed to identify the knee disease-specific outcome tools in Arabic and evaluate their methodological quality of psychometric properties of the most promising tools based on the COSMIN checklist and PRISMA guidelines. Articles published in English, from the inception of databases until the date of search (10 August 2022), were included. Articles without at least one psychometric property (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) evaluation, and articles other than in the English language, were excluded from the study. The key terms [“Arabic” AND “Knee” AND (“Questionnaire” OR “Scale”)] were used in three databases, i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) in the advanced search strategy. Key terms were either in the title or abstract for PubMed. Key words were in the topic (TS) for WoS. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) risk of bias checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of psychometric properties of the Arabic knee-related outcome measures. A total of 99 articles were identified in PubMed, SCOPUS, and WoS. After passing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 articles describing 22 scales from five countries were included in this review. The instruments validated in the Arabic language are Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), knee outcome survey- activities of daily living scale (KOS-ADLS), Oxford knee score (OKS), anterior knee pain scale, osteoarthritis of knee and hip health-related quality of life (OAKHQoL) scale, Lysholm knee score (LKS), international documentation committee subjective knee form (IKDC), intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, Kujala patellofemoral pain scoring system (PFPSS), anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) and osteoarthritis quality of life questionnaire (OAQoL),. All were found to have good test-retest reliability (Intra Correlation Coefficient), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and construct validity (Visual Analog Scale, Short Form-12, RAND-36, etc.). Of 20 instruments available to assess self-reported knee symptoms and function, 12 were validated in the Saudi Arabian population. Among them, KOS-ADLS is the best PROM to be used in various knee conditions, followed by KOOS and WOMAC. The assessed methodological quality of evidence says that the knee Arabic PROMs are reliable instruments to evaluate knee symptoms/function.

show abstract

Measurement properties of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Patello-Femoral questionnaire in Saudi Arabians

Cited by 13 publications

References 22 publications

Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis Subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis Subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Spanish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About