2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4748-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review

Abstract: I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
76
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
76
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because of the broad characteristics of SEFIP-dance, we were able to change and adjust the translated and adapted version of SEFIP-dance for use among athletes and exercise practitioners (SEFIP-sport). There are several specific questionnaires in the scientific literature that address complaints relating to certain parts of the body, such as the knee, 19 hip, 20 ankle and foot, 21 shoulder, 22 hand and wrist, 17 cervical spine 23,24 and lumbar spine. 4 However, to assess the presence of musculoskeletal pain or discomfort throughout the body, the NMQ remains the tool most commonly used in research and clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because of the broad characteristics of SEFIP-dance, we were able to change and adjust the translated and adapted version of SEFIP-dance for use among athletes and exercise practitioners (SEFIP-sport). There are several specific questionnaires in the scientific literature that address complaints relating to certain parts of the body, such as the knee, 19 hip, 20 ankle and foot, 21 shoulder, 22 hand and wrist, 17 cervical spine 23,24 and lumbar spine. 4 However, to assess the presence of musculoskeletal pain or discomfort throughout the body, the NMQ remains the tool most commonly used in research and clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Bergen et al stated that the minimal detectable changes for each FAOS subscore were 17.1-20.8 at the individual level and 2.0-2.4 at the group level in the validation of the German version of the FAOS [9]. In a recent review, the FAOS was shown to be a reliable tool for the re-evaluation of ankle injuries and the assessment of recovery [13]. Considering these data, it is possible to compare our FAOS scores with results from other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple regression model was tested for multicollinearity. If multicollinearity was present, we retained in the model the variable with the higher b value and that has been more commonly used in research of individuals with ankle problems (15). Statistical signi cance was set at p<0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%