Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND The dramatic growth of digital health applications has posed an urgent demand for rigorous usability assessment tools. While the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) has been increasingly utilized as a validated tool to evaluate the usability of digital health applications, there is no validated Chinese version available. OBJECTIVE To translate and culturally adapt the Health-ITUES into Chinese, revise its customized parts to cater to both service consumers and professional care providers, and evaluate its reliability and validity in the Chinese context. METHODS Following the Guideline for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, the original Health-ITUES was translated and cross-culturally adapted into the Chinese version and then customized to the Care Receiver Version (Health-ITUES-R) and Professional Care Provider Version (Health-ITUES-P) based on the overall objectives and functional components of the SMART application. Older individuals and nurses were subsequently included in the validation test from December 2020 to February 2021. Content validity, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were used to evaluate the psychometric attributes of the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P. RESULTS A Chinese version of the Health-ITUES comprising 20 items across 4 dimensions was formulated. Based on this, the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P were customized. Both the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P demonstrated satisfactory content validity, internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated a four-dimension model consistent with the original scale structure and exhibited acceptable model fit. Furthermore, Pearson's correlation coefficients between the Health-ITUES-R and reflected a high between the Health-ITUES-R and Patient Acceptance Questionnaire for Mobile Health Application reflected a high criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS The Chinese version of the Health-ITUES is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the usability of digital health applications for both care receivers and professional care providers. CLINICALTRIAL Not Applicable
BACKGROUND The dramatic growth of digital health applications has posed an urgent demand for rigorous usability assessment tools. While the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) has been increasingly utilized as a validated tool to evaluate the usability of digital health applications, there is no validated Chinese version available. OBJECTIVE To translate and culturally adapt the Health-ITUES into Chinese, revise its customized parts to cater to both service consumers and professional care providers, and evaluate its reliability and validity in the Chinese context. METHODS Following the Guideline for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, the original Health-ITUES was translated and cross-culturally adapted into the Chinese version and then customized to the Care Receiver Version (Health-ITUES-R) and Professional Care Provider Version (Health-ITUES-P) based on the overall objectives and functional components of the SMART application. Older individuals and nurses were subsequently included in the validation test from December 2020 to February 2021. Content validity, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were used to evaluate the psychometric attributes of the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P. RESULTS A Chinese version of the Health-ITUES comprising 20 items across 4 dimensions was formulated. Based on this, the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P were customized. Both the Health-ITUES-R and Health-ITUES-P demonstrated satisfactory content validity, internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated a four-dimension model consistent with the original scale structure and exhibited acceptable model fit. Furthermore, Pearson's correlation coefficients between the Health-ITUES-R and reflected a high between the Health-ITUES-R and Patient Acceptance Questionnaire for Mobile Health Application reflected a high criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS The Chinese version of the Health-ITUES is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the usability of digital health applications for both care receivers and professional care providers. CLINICALTRIAL Not Applicable
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.