2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3033800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements and Analysis of Personal Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields at Outdoor and Indoor School Buildings: A Case Study at a Spanish School

Abstract: Personal exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) has increased due to the development of a society of information and the implementation of new technologies. Most studies about RF-EMF are focused on adult exposure in different microenvironments, but these studies do not usually consider places where children are exposed. We present results of measurements and analysis of personal exposure to RF-EMF at outdoor and indoor school buildings, at a Spanish school, a place where children and employ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to the indoor RF-EMF sources, their number and their locations, as well as the structure of the rooms and their furniture, are affected by a lack of information especially for private environments [7]. Depending on local circumstances, in general, personal wireless cellular communications (UL or DL signals usually for voice or communication or data exchange), cellular BS general exposure DL signals and Wi-Fi Access Points (access to Internet) are the main contributions to total RF-EMF exposure when analyzing indoor environments [18,[27][28]. With the introduction of new generation of wireless communication technologies and the Smart Concept worldwide, an expanding demand with huge increase in data transmission has presented, mostly, in the last decade, outpacing current capacity and increasing the RF-EMF exposure associated [29][30][31].…”
Section: B Environmental Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the indoor RF-EMF sources, their number and their locations, as well as the structure of the rooms and their furniture, are affected by a lack of information especially for private environments [7]. Depending on local circumstances, in general, personal wireless cellular communications (UL or DL signals usually for voice or communication or data exchange), cellular BS general exposure DL signals and Wi-Fi Access Points (access to Internet) are the main contributions to total RF-EMF exposure when analyzing indoor environments [18,[27][28]. With the introduction of new generation of wireless communication technologies and the Smart Concept worldwide, an expanding demand with huge increase in data transmission has presented, mostly, in the last decade, outpacing current capacity and increasing the RF-EMF exposure associated [29][30][31].…”
Section: B Environmental Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies also refer to risk perception, but the results were only obtained from questionnaire application without carrying out measurements of personal exposure [ 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ], and other studies that measured exposure to RF-EMF did not evaluate risk perception [ 15 , 79 , 92 , 93 ]. As stated in the introduction, most studies on this topic are conducted in Europe, not in Mexico, and therefore this is a novel study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this exposure is divided in exposure caused by one’s own usage of mobile devices, so-called auto-induced exposure, and exposure caused by the network and other users nearby, so-called environmental exposure [ 7 , 9 , 21 ]. Various methods have been developed with the aim to assess this exposure such as: spatio-temporal maps [ 3 ], personal microenvironmental measurements [ 32 , 35 ], spot measurements [ 17 , 36 ], geospatial modelling [ 5 , 18 ], survey studies [ 11 , 37 ], and simulations [ 4 , 29 ]. In the study of Röösli et al [ 19 ] a protocol was developed that can reduce dependency on the used method of measurement results in different studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%