1985
DOI: 10.1029/jd090id01p02131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements and parameterization of particulate sulfur dry deposition over grass

Abstract: Eddy correlation measurements of particulate sulfur fluxes at the 1981 and 1982 Dry DepositionIntercomparison Experiments indicate a strong diurnal variation in deposition velocity (downward flux divided by concentration, at a height near 6 m). Most of the run-to-run variability for data collection periods of 30 min seems to be due to unwanted sensor noise. Systematic changes of fluxes wth height due to possible advection from strong point sources of sulfur can occur but should be quite small. A parameterizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
141
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the morphology of heather is comparably efficient in collecting aerosols, but the somewhat large average V d found at Elspeet were probably a consequence of the strong increase in V d during unstable conditions, which often occurred during the warm measurement period. This increase is qualitatively consistent with former observations (Wesely et al, 1985;Vong et al, 2004).…”
Section: Gas-aerosol Conversions During Advectionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is possible that the morphology of heather is comparably efficient in collecting aerosols, but the somewhat large average V d found at Elspeet were probably a consequence of the strong increase in V d during unstable conditions, which often occurred during the warm measurement period. This increase is qualitatively consistent with former observations (Wesely et al, 1985;Vong et al, 2004).…”
Section: Gas-aerosol Conversions During Advectionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The EFLAT 0.52 ”m diameter value of 0.44 cm s −1 for V dt during unstable conditions is a little larger than values reported by Wesely et al (1983Wesely et al ( , 1985 while the EFLAT value of 0.3 cm s −1 during near-neutral conditions is similar to experimental values reported by Hummelshoj (1994), Gallagher et al (1997), and Nemitz et al (2002) for particles of this size.…”
Section: Aerosol Deposition Velocity As a Function Of Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 45%
“…particle fluxes (top panel) and for mean values (for data binned into ten equal increments of the RHS of eq.5; bottom panel). Gallagher et al (1997) and Wesely et al, (1985) previously fit this parameterization to their measured aerosol V d for unstable to neutral conditions. While the numerical coefficient (C) in Eq.…”
Section: Size-dependence Of Deposition Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%