2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods and direct or indirect measurements and use of models were employed to quantify SOC stocks (Mäkipää et al, 2012). The use of these different methods and measurements are to increase precision and accuracy during quantification of SOC (Smith et al, 2010).…”
Section: Soc Measurement and Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods and direct or indirect measurements and use of models were employed to quantify SOC stocks (Mäkipää et al, 2012). The use of these different methods and measurements are to increase precision and accuracy during quantification of SOC (Smith et al, 2010).…”
Section: Soc Measurement and Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have summarized the findings of Ciais et al (2010); Smith et al (2010); Jia et al (2012); Ma et al (2013); Haque et al (2015a) for determination of NECB as follows:…”
Section: Estimation Of Necbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the net exchanges of CO 2 could be measured by soil organic C (SOC) changes over a subdecadal or decadal timescale (Pan et al 2004;Lu et al 2009). The NECB analysis is developed as a powerful tool to estimate soil C balance between C sequestration and CO 2 emission (Chapin et al 2006;Smith et al 2010). This method has not been studied adequately in relation to CCB incorporation rates and water management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem with this configuration is caused by the pressure difference between the chamber and the ambient air, often caused by the applied high flow rates. Any pressure differences larger than one-fifth of a Pa can seriously affect the measured CO 2 efflux (Fang and Moncrieff, 1998;Smith et al, 2010). Serious changes in environmental conditions above the soil surface in the chambers (decreased boundary layer caused by high flow rates, very low or very high CO 2 concentrations, etc.)…”
Section: Z Nagy Et Al: Carbon Fluxes Of Surfaces Vs Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study we sought to contribute to decreasing the uncertainty arising from typical nighttime limitations in eddy flux measurements over flat terrain (Massman and Lee, 2002;Smith et al, 2010). A third goal of the study was to investigate soil respiration dynamics by the gradient method within the soil profile after rainstorms, as a significant percentage of the total CO 2 fluxes occur during these events in drought-prone grasslands ecosystems (Xu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Z Nagy Et Al: Carbon Fluxes Of Surfaces Vs Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%