1977
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-50-599-769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of endosteal surface areas in human long bones: relationship to sites of occurrence of osteosarcoma

Abstract: Using techniques of bone scanning and ashing, the areas of the endosteal surfaces in cortical and trabecular bone have been determined for the proximal, mid and distal thirds of each of the six long bones of an adult human subject. The relative frequency of occurrence of bone sarcomas, scored as to site, has been analysed in relation to these measured areas. Data on tumour occurrence have been drawn from three sources: radium-case data from Rowland and Keane (33 cases), naturally-occurring cases from series by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that in the case of cortical bone, where the path lengths through Haversian canals and resorption cavities are very small, high values of si5s/D, are obtained for the femoral cortex for low p-particle energies (table 4) and for ""Bu cc-particles (table 5). These high values of dose rate in cortical bone, however, may be of less biological significance than the dose rates near trabecular surfaces because there is some evidence (Spiers, King and Beddoe 1977) that cortical surfaces are less sensitive to tumour induction than those in trabecular bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It should be noted that in the case of cortical bone, where the path lengths through Haversian canals and resorption cavities are very small, high values of si5s/D, are obtained for the femoral cortex for low p-particle energies (table 4) and for ""Bu cc-particles (table 5). These high values of dose rate in cortical bone, however, may be of less biological significance than the dose rates near trabecular surfaces because there is some evidence (Spiers, King and Beddoe 1977) that cortical surfaces are less sensitive to tumour induction than those in trabecular bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%