1984
DOI: 10.3758/bf03333861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of everyday memory: Toward the prevention of forgetting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of everyday memory phenomena can be placed in four categories: (1) experimental simulation and laboratory tests [Ebbinghaus 1885], (2) direct observation [Neisser 1982], (3) inventories and questionnaire based investigations [Hermann & Neisser 1978], and (4) diary studies [Crovitz & Daniel 1984].…”
Section: Methods Of Studying Everyday Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of everyday memory phenomena can be placed in four categories: (1) experimental simulation and laboratory tests [Ebbinghaus 1885], (2) direct observation [Neisser 1982], (3) inventories and questionnaire based investigations [Hermann & Neisser 1978], and (4) diary studies [Crovitz & Daniel 1984].…”
Section: Methods Of Studying Everyday Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM tasks are prevalent in everyday life and errors in PM may account for more than half of all daily memory problems (Crovitz & Daniel, 1984). In line with the ubiquitous nature of PM, the effects of age on PM performance have received increasing research attention, because PM failures can hamper autonomy and independence in old age (Einstein & McDaniel, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maylor 1990). Several studies have shown that errors in prospective memory account for more than half of the overall memory problems and are crucial for the development and maintenance of independent living (Crovitz and Daniel 1984;Terry 1988), particularly in old age (McDaniel et al 2008). Therefore, many researchers have focused on factors that may explain age differences in prospective remembering (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%