2010
DOI: 10.2221/jcsj.45.506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Flow Loss in Helical-Type Seawater MHD Power Generator

Abstract: Synopsis:To construct a calculation model of flow loss in a helical-type seawater magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) power generator, it is important to elucidate the effects of the rotation number, the pitch length and the inner diameter of the helical wall on the pressure distribution and flow loss. The pressure distribution and flow loss in experimental devices constructed to model generators with a helical wall made of polyvinyl chloride with an outer diameter of 100 mm, inner diameters of 10, 20 and 30 mm, pitch … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the seawater MHD generator has the advantages of no mechanical parts and being maintenance-free as well as low loss and high efficiency in comparison with a conventional seawater turbine [1]. In seawater MHD generation, a new helical-type seawater MHD power generator using a solenoid superconducting magnet is an attractive renewable energy source that can be installed offshore [2][3][4][5][6][7]. So far, the experimental values of the electromotive force and output of the generator have been smaller than the calculated values [2,4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the seawater MHD generator has the advantages of no mechanical parts and being maintenance-free as well as low loss and high efficiency in comparison with a conventional seawater turbine [1]. In seawater MHD generation, a new helical-type seawater MHD power generator using a solenoid superconducting magnet is an attractive renewable energy source that can be installed offshore [2][3][4][5][6][7]. So far, the experimental values of the electromotive force and output of the generator have been smaller than the calculated values [2,4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%