Measurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry‐free radiation therapy

Abstract

Introduction Recent advances in image guidance and adaptive radiotherapy could enable gantry‐free radiotherapy using patient rotation. Gantry‐free radiotherapy could substantially reduce the cost of radiotherapy systems and facilities. MRI guidance complements a gantry‐free approach because of its ability to visualise soft tissue deformation during rotation. A potential barrier to gantry‐free radiotherapy is patient acceptability, especially when combined with MRI. This study investigates human experiences of horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner. Methods Ten healthy human participants and nine participants previously treated with radiotherapy were rotated within an MRI scanner. Participants' anxiety and motion sickness was assessed before being rotated in 45‐degree increments and paused, representing a multi‐field intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment. An MR image was acquired at each 45‐degree angle. Following imaging, anxiety and motion sickness were re‐assessed, followed by a comfort questionnaire and exit interview. The significance of the differences in anxiety and motion sickness pre‐ versus post‐imaging was assessed using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Content analysis was performed on exit interview transcripts. Results Eight of ten healthy and eight of nine patient participants completed the imaging session. Mean anxiety scores before and after imaging were 7.9/100 and 11.8/100, respectively (P = 0.26), and mean motion sickness scores were 5.3/100 and 13.7/100, respectively (P = 0.02). Most participants indicated likely acceptance of rotation if MRI were to be used in a hypothetical treatment. Physical discomfort was reported to be the biggest concern. Conclusions Horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner was acceptable for most (17/19) participants.

Characterizing magnetically focused contamination electrons by off‐axis irradiation on an inline MRI‐Linac

“…Note if the spoiler was placed in‐field, it would act as a bolus for the treatment that may be beneficial for superficial tumors. The Australian MR‐Linac has primarily been used for fixed gantry irradiation; however, human rotation is actively being investigated for future human trials 51 . Off‐axis treatment could be a suitable treatment option to avoid excessive skin dose and is unlikely to require lengthened TPS computation time or exhibit image distortion for all fields, excluding those that are large or open.…”

Compliance of volunteers in a fully-enclosed patient rotation system for MR-guided radiation therapy – a prospective study

“…In this respect, it has been hypothesized that gantries can be omitted by rotating the patient in front of xed-beam nozzles (3,4). First partially-enclosed prototype devices for patient rotation have already been investigated in small scale to test feasibility and imaging capabilities (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). While imaging in particle therapy today usually is performed with x-ray-based systems, also the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly important (10)(11)(12).…”

Please Place Your Seat in the Full Upright Position: A Technical Framework for Landing Upright Radiation Therapy in the 21st Century

“…Further, with appropriate immobilization, an upright patient could be comfortably rotated relative to a fixed beam to vary the treatment angle, reducing the need for a rotating gantry ( 9 ). Gantry-free treatment is being explored via horizontal patient rotation but is complicated by challenges such as angle-dependent patient deformation due to gravity ( 10 , 11 ). Importantly, the vertical rotation could be done faster than a gantry rotation around the patient (increasing from less than 1 rpm to as much as 3-7 rpm, such as used for Total Skin Electron Treatment) thereby increasing scope for breath-hold and improving image quality ( 12 , 13 ).…”