2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-005-0209-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of hydrodynamic forces, surface pressure, and wake for obliquely towed tanker model and uncertainty analysis for CFD validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a test case, the authors considered to simulate steady drifting motion of wigley hull and a tanker called KVLCC2M (Fig.4) in unbounded fluid for which the experimental data are available in publications 16,17) . For wigley hull only the straight ahead motion simulation has been conducted with three different grids to carry out the grid convergence study of the numerical result.…”
Section: Simulating Criteria For Subject Shipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a test case, the authors considered to simulate steady drifting motion of wigley hull and a tanker called KVLCC2M (Fig.4) in unbounded fluid for which the experimental data are available in publications 16,17) . For wigley hull only the straight ahead motion simulation has been conducted with three different grids to carry out the grid convergence study of the numerical result.…”
Section: Simulating Criteria For Subject Shipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unstructured grid the oscillations in result caused by the adoption of second order differencing scheme have been minimized through the implementation of a slope limiter algorithm in discretizing the diffusion term of the RANS equation. The verification and validation of the code were achieved through the comparison of the simulated hull forces and moment acting on a tanker and a wigley hull with experiment data 16,17) . The simulated distribution of wake at the propeller plane suggests a lack in the generation of turbulent kinetic energy in the boundary layer, which can be attributed to the adoption of wall function in the prediction of velocity distribution near the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 3, the predicted resistance in deep water is compared to previous calculations and to the experiments 1 (indicated by D, with U D = 1.0%D) performed by MOERI [6]. Additionally, results from tests by Kume et al [23] with the KVLCC2M hull form (identical to the KVLCC2 except for some fairing of the propeller shaft) are added (U D = 3.3%D ). The KVLCC2M resistance value has been corrected for the difference in Reynolds number, using a form factor (1 + k) = 1.2.…”
Section: Straight Ahead Sailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a significant number of computational studies [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In addition, the KVLCC2 was one of the benchmark tests in the ship hydrodynamics CFD workshops Gothenburg 2000 [27] and Tokyo 2005 [24,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive experimental data are available ranging from towing tank measurements [20][21][22][23][24] to wind tunnel experiments [25]. There are also a significant number of computational studies [26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%