“…It can be seen that for the medium-Z elements the calculation results from these theoretical models and the empirical formulae were very close each other and in good agreement with the experimental K-shell ionization cross sections, but for lower-and higher-Z elements the calculation results from these theoretical models and the empirical formulae were obviously different. For the experimental data of L-shell X-ray production cross sections, from the recently published papers we noticed that for higher-Z elements, for example, W (Z = 74), Pt (Z = 78), Au (Z = 79) [10] Au (Z = 79) [8] and Pb (Z = 82) [16], the DWBA [4][5][6] and PWBA-C-Ex theories [2,3] can describe very well the experimental L a [10] and L a , L b [8] X-ray production cross sections. However, for lower-Z elements, for example, Ga (Z = 31), As (Z = 33) [9] and Ag (Z = 47) [8], the predictions of the DWBA theory [4][5][6] and the PWBA-C-Ex theory [2,3] are similar [9] and in general $10-25% larger than the experimental data [8,9], but except for Ge (Z = 32) element where the predictions of the DWBA theory [4][5][6] were slightly smaller than the experimental data [11].…”