2022
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2021.3123814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Low-Energy Protons Using a Silicon Detector for Application to SEE Testing

Abstract: A silicon detector with a fast electronics chain is used for the dosimetry of protons in the range 0.5-5 MeV at the CNA 3 MV Tandem laboratory in Seville, Spain. In this configuration, measurements can be performed in pulsed mode, using a digitizer to record event-by-event proton energy depositions. The distributions of deposited energy were obtained thanks to a calibration with an alpha source. Measurements of flux and deposited energy are used to enable SEE testing on selected SRAMs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimentally measured SEU cross section upon irradiation of 16 devices is (4.76 ± 0.78) × 10 −16 cm 2 /bit. This SRAM was also tested with low-energy protons at CNA [31,33,35] with peak cross section > 10 −9 cm 2 /bit. Finally, to assess the relative impact of thermal neutrons in actual environments, it is necessary to relate the corresponding thermal neutron soft error rate to that from high-energy neutrons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentally measured SEU cross section upon irradiation of 16 devices is (4.76 ± 0.78) × 10 −16 cm 2 /bit. This SRAM was also tested with low-energy protons at CNA [31,33,35] with peak cross section > 10 −9 cm 2 /bit. Finally, to assess the relative impact of thermal neutrons in actual environments, it is necessary to relate the corresponding thermal neutron soft error rate to that from high-energy neutrons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the methodology, we used an approach in line with [ 23 ]. First, the proton beam was focused on a scintillator that was placed in the same sample holder as the device under test (DUT), to check the position, shape, and size of the beam to work with around 1 cm 2 spot size; this pencil area completely covers the sensitive area of the DUT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 [19], [20]. In the case of detector I, the calibration involved a proton beam with 10 energies between 0.5 MeV and 2.97 MeV, also exploitable for electronics testing [21]. Detector II was calibrated with an alpha beam of 4 different energies between 2.97 MeV and 8.95 MeV.…”
Section: A Energy Calibration At Cnamentioning
confidence: 99%