2009
DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.2009.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Orbital Volume Change Using Computed Tomography in Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computerized temporal muscle measurements were made with the Vitrea program (Vitrea 2 Vital v4.1.8.0, Vital Images Inc., Minnetonka, MN), which is designed to measure volumetric parameters of cranial CTA images. 10,11 Temporal muscle volumes were calculated by marking the entire temporal muscle, including the origin and insertion sites, in the soft-tissue window using the "organ selection tool" option in all CTA images (►Fig. 2).…”
Section: Measurement Of Temporal Muscle Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized temporal muscle measurements were made with the Vitrea program (Vitrea 2 Vital v4.1.8.0, Vital Images Inc., Minnetonka, MN), which is designed to measure volumetric parameters of cranial CTA images. 10,11 Temporal muscle volumes were calculated by marking the entire temporal muscle, including the origin and insertion sites, in the soft-tissue window using the "organ selection tool" option in all CTA images (►Fig. 2).…”
Section: Measurement Of Temporal Muscle Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of software has been designed and applied for CT-based volumetric assessment over the years that have contributed significantly in this evolution and opened up scope for further research. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Difference or not in the orbital volume between two sides has also been studied extensively on dry skulls. [21][22][23][24][25] Felding et al in his study aimed at comparison of orbital volumes between the right and left sides found a difference of about 0.19 mm (24.42 mm on the right and 24.13 on the left).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those operative indications caused some confusion for clinical use and did not yield any objective preoperative numerical guidelines that could estimate eventual enopthalmos degree for determining the need for surgery. When the patients did not have any limitation of ocular movement, the ophthalmic surgeon needed to determine whether to perform the operation by evaluating the preoperative CT image and the enophthalmos measurements [10]. But, enophthalmos might not appear in the preoperative period due to periorbital swelling, and the preoperative enophthalmos measurements would not be useful as a reliable surgical guideline [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%