2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of particle size distributions produced by humidifiers operating in high humidity storage environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass concentration of particles generated by the humidifier with RO water was below the detection limit (<0.01 mg/m 3 ) but the number concentration was similar to tap water. The size distribution pattern with tap water and high-silica water was similar to a previous report [ 22 ] (Figure 1 A). The humidifier generated visible fog (micro-sized water droplets) and submicro-sized residuals; however, because the SMA-CPC system could detect particles with diameter 10–410 nm, we characterized only the residuals as particles but not obtain size distribution data of the primary water droplets of the humidifier.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mass concentration of particles generated by the humidifier with RO water was below the detection limit (<0.01 mg/m 3 ) but the number concentration was similar to tap water. The size distribution pattern with tap water and high-silica water was similar to a previous report [ 22 ] (Figure 1 A). The humidifier generated visible fog (micro-sized water droplets) and submicro-sized residuals; however, because the SMA-CPC system could detect particles with diameter 10–410 nm, we characterized only the residuals as particles but not obtain size distribution data of the primary water droplets of the humidifier.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More readings with an RH over 100% were observed in the ultrasonic chamber than in the nanomist chamber. This difference could be one reason that the number density of mists produced by the ultrasonic humidifier was four times greater than the nanomist humidifier (Hung et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mists are occasionally generated by ultrasonic humidifiers, and their average particle diameters vary between 2.9 lm (Rodes et al, 1990) and 216 nm (Hung et al, 2010b). The large mists can easily wet the surface of produce, which is covered by a laminar film of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have provided information on the particle size distribution of aerosols generated by ultrasonic humidifiers [34, 35, 67, 68]. Rodes et al [34] reported a count median diameter of 1.8 μ m and a mass median diameter of 2.9 μ m for wet aerosols from an ultrasonic humidifier using tap water with a total dissolved solids concentration of about 100 mg/L.…”
Section: Application and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After drying, Rhodes et al [34] estimated that the count median diameter for the aerosols from the tap water was about 0.1 μ m. Highsmith et al [35] reported count median diameters of about 0.2—0.3 μ m for dry aerosols generated by an ultrasonic humidifier using tap water with a total dissolved solids concentration of about 300 mg/L. Hung et al [67] (water type not specified) and Umezawa et al [68] (using tap water) both reported particle size distributions for dry aerosols with peaks at about 0.2 μ m. Hung et al [67] found that the size distributions peaked at about the same aerosol size for both ambient (22°C and 70% relative humidity) and cold-storage (about 5°C and 80-90% relative humidity) conditions. No studies were identified that estimated deposition fractions for inhalation exposures associated with humidifier use.…”
Section: Application and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%