1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00263-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of peroxyacyl nitrates (PANS) in Mexico City: implications for megacity air quality impacts on regional scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute modeled concentrations of PAN are comparable in Mexico and Paris, and are significantly higher than in Nashville. The model PAN is approximately 50% lower than the average from an ensemble of measurements at one station in Mexico City (Gaffney et al, 1999). High concentrations of PAN were also reported in model results by Lei et al (2007).…”
Section: Comparison Between Mexico City Parismentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Absolute modeled concentrations of PAN are comparable in Mexico and Paris, and are significantly higher than in Nashville. The model PAN is approximately 50% lower than the average from an ensemble of measurements at one station in Mexico City (Gaffney et al, 1999). High concentrations of PAN were also reported in model results by Lei et al (2007).…”
Section: Comparison Between Mexico City Parismentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Results for Mexico are similar at 13-14 h and 15-16 h on 4 March, although on 2 March the O 3 -PAN correlation for Mexico showed greater scatter. The measurements from Gaffney et al (1999) showed a loose correlation between PAN and O 3 with an average PAN/O 3 ratio equal to .12 for O 3 above 100 ppb. The model PAN/O 3 is significantly lower (.07) but the measured PAN, O 3 , and PAN/O 3 still fall within the range of measured values.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mexico City Parismentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gaffney et al (1999), Tie et al (2009), Li et al (2011) and Shrivastava et al (2011) for Mexico City; Hodnebrog et al (2011) for European megacities and Cairo; Lin et al (2010) for Beijing and Pearl River extended areas). These investigations clearly showed the importance of megacities as pollution sources for the surrounding areas; their contribution to regional scale ozone (O 3 ) and secondary aerosols during LRT and to peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) produced in the megacities extended areas and downwind (Gaffney et al, 1999;Molina et al, 2010). Large amounts of carbon monoxide (CO) are transported from urban centers to the downwind areas and contribute significantly to the hydroxyl (OH) reactivity in the city and along the outflow (Tie et al, 2009: MIRAGE-Mex project (Megacities Impact on Regional and Global Environments-Mexico City Case Study)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them were based on measurements within and outside of the urban plumes from particular cities (Freney et al, 2014;Lin et al, 1996;Gaffney et al, 1999;Molina et al, 2010;Kuhn et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2006). There has also been model-based efforts to estimate the cities fingerprint on the atmospheric chemistry across multiple scales: on a global scale, Lawrence et al (2007), Lawrence (2009), Folberth et al (2010) and Stock et al (2013) gave estimates on the city emissions impact on the surrounding environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%