2005
DOI: 10.2172/934610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Secondary Electron Emission Effects in the Hall Thruster Discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, the peak electron temperature for each throttling condition is plotted scaled with the discharge voltage. We compare this with the trend noted in [38][39], where it is stated that the peak electron temperature stays roughly proportional (by a factor of approximately 0.12) to the discharge voltage for a wide variety of examined thrusters. It can be observed that the over-estimation of the peak electron temperature with respect to the experimental results occurs in all cases, except for the 400V-3kW case.…”
Section: Fig 2 Left: Plasma Potential and Electron Temperature In Tsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…3, the peak electron temperature for each throttling condition is plotted scaled with the discharge voltage. We compare this with the trend noted in [38][39], where it is stated that the peak electron temperature stays roughly proportional (by a factor of approximately 0.12) to the discharge voltage for a wide variety of examined thrusters. It can be observed that the over-estimation of the peak electron temperature with respect to the experimental results occurs in all cases, except for the 400V-3kW case.…”
Section: Fig 2 Left: Plasma Potential and Electron Temperature In Tsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Modeling indicated that the presence of low secondary electron emission (SEE) material in the channel could have been responsible for shifting the acceleration region upstream and reducing the plume divergence [7]. Recent experimental results have demonstrated the effect of low SEE carbon electrodes on the electron temperature [8], in qualitative agreement with several thruster models [9][10][11]. Modeling by Fruchtman et al suggests that an electrode in the channel may enhance efficiency and provide control of the electric field profile in the thruster [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It has been concluded that only the plasma azimuthal fluctuations are responsible for anomalous electron transport inside and outside the Hall thruster channel. Nevertheless, changing the wall material of Hall thrusters results in significant plasma parameters and electron axial current changes [30][31][32]. Then, there are strong arguments to conclude that the azimuthal fluctuations could be induced by surface effects.…”
Section: The Anomalous Electron Cross-field Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%