2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of size-fractionated concentration and bulk dry deposition of atmospheric particulate bound mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes deposition processes, such as turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, gravitational settling, and particle rebound. Our estimation of deposition flux should be more accurate than those using a constant deposition velocity in previous studies such as Fang et al (2012), Wang et al (2006), and Lombard et al (2011).…”
Section: Calculation Of Wet and Dry Depositionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It includes deposition processes, such as turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, gravitational settling, and particle rebound. Our estimation of deposition flux should be more accurate than those using a constant deposition velocity in previous studies such as Fang et al (2012), Wang et al (2006), and Lombard et al (2011).…”
Section: Calculation Of Wet and Dry Depositionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Particulate mercury is associated with airborne particles, such as dust, soot, and sea salt aerosols, and is likely produced by adsorption of RGM onto atmospheric particles (Lu and Schroeder, 2004). Most research indicates higher Hg P concentrations and fractions in suspended particles in urban or industrial areas than in rural areas (Fang et al, 2001a(Fang et al, , 2011a(Fang et al, , 2012Kim et al, 2012). Also, some measurements of Hg P were conducted to estimate the dry deposition of mercury onto the particle surface (Fang et al, 2011b(Fang et al, , 2011cWan et al, 2009b;Keeler et al, 1995;Chand et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPBM contributions to Hg wet deposition may be important because coarse particles are easily removed by below-cloud scavenging [Andronache, 2003;Henzing et al, 2006] and CPBM concentrations in air are not negligible [Feddersen et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2014]. The importance of CPBM in the dry deposition budget was demonstrated in field data and modeling results [Fang et al, 2012]. Considering that particle scavenging by rain (size-resolved scavenging coefficient) and particle dry deposition (size-resolved dry deposition velocity) are greater for coarse particles than accumulation mode particles [Petroff and Zhang, 2010;Wang et al, 2014], CPBM may contribute more than FPBM to the wet deposition budget.…”
Section: Estimation Of Gom Fpbm and Cpbm Contributions To Hg Wet Dementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although this gas-particle partitioning assumption is valid for most locations, the sources and formation of CPBM remain to be uncertain and could vary with location. The Hg mass fraction in coarse particles was also limited to 30% of the total PBM mass (i.e., C CPBM /(C CPBM + C FPBM ) ≤ 0.3) because previous studies have typically reported a lower Hg mass fraction in coarse aerosols than fine aerosols [Fang et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2014]. One exception is at two coastal/marine locations in New Hampshire, USA, that observed coarse Hg fraction (e.g., 0.5-0.6) during summer 2009 likely because of GOM partitioning to sea-salt aerosols.…”
Section: 1002/2015jd023769mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it has short residence time of 1-2 days [1,7]. The residence time of PBM is dependent on the size of particles, but, generally, it has been assumed to be a few days [8,9]. The predominant form of Hg in ambient air is GEM due to its low solubility in water, small deposition velocity, and relatively low reaction rates; therefore, it can be transported long distances and is often considered as a global transboundary pollutant (residence time = 0.5-1 yr) [7,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%