2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.13995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of stiff-material compliance on the nanoscale using ultrasonic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[45] can be very small. The specifics of the cantilever spectrum and contact behavior determine how small the linear response is and whether it is "dynamically static" [DIN00]. Thus, it is still unclear whether the response observed in UFM experiments is due to a linear response averaged over a nonlinear profile or due to more complex nonlinear behavior, such as described in section 2.3 and in [TUR03].…”
Section: Measurements and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[45] can be very small. The specifics of the cantilever spectrum and contact behavior determine how small the linear response is and whether it is "dynamically static" [DIN00]. Thus, it is still unclear whether the response observed in UFM experiments is due to a linear response averaged over a nonlinear profile or due to more complex nonlinear behavior, such as described in section 2.3 and in [TUR03].…”
Section: Measurements and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is difficult to characterize the tip directly, approaches that eliminate the need for such information have been developed. UFM methods for obtaining quantitative elastic-property information were investigated extensively using an approach called differential UFM [KOL93,DIN00]. With this method, the cantilever response was measured for two different applied forces.…”
Section: Measurements and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By measuring the contact resonances of the cantilever, and by employing appropriate theoretical models, the local contact stiffness and, subsequently, the local elastic modulus can be obtained quantitatively. [13][14][15][16] Moreover, by modulating the tip-sample interaction at a frequency close to one of the contact resonance frequencies while scanning the sample surface, or by recording contact resonances point-by-point across the scan area and calculating subsequently, semi-quantitative or even quantitative mapping of the mechanical properties of the sample surface can be realized. [17][18][19][20][21][22] However, the material properties, contact conditions, loading forces, excitation amplitudes and the operating frequency can affect the final results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis of the ultrasonic curves, information about the tip-sample interaction force can be obtained, and the elastic and adhesive properties of the tip-sample contact can be derived. The procedure of differential UFM has been proposed to extract quantitative information about the sample stiffness with nanoscale resolution [38], based on the measurement of the threshold amplitudes a i of the ultrasonic curves for two different initial tip-sample normal forces F i . If the normal forces do not differ much, the effective contact stiffness S eff can be obtained as follows…”
Section: Ufm Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations of the UFM curves have been done introducing the concept of modified tip-sample force curves [38] (see Fig. 3.7).…”
Section: Ufm Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%