2005
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2005-02138-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the charge asymmetry of the Dalitz plot parameters for $K^{\pm}\to\pi^{\pm}\pi^0\pi^0$ decays

Abstract: Measurements of the Charge Asymmetry of the Dalitz Plot Parameters for Decays AbstractThe charge asymmetry of the g, h, and k Dalitz plot parameters for K ± → π ± π 0 π 0 decays has been measured with 35 GeV/c hadron beams at the 70 GeV IHEP accelerator. The g, h, and k values obtained appear to be identical for K ± decays within the errors quoted. In particular, the charge asymmetry A g = (g + −g − )/(g + + g − ) of the slope g is equal to (0.2 ± 1.9) · 10 −3 .

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown in our paper [5] that the event distributions in the Dalitz plots for K + and K − decays are identical. Taking this into account we used combined statistics for K ± → π ± π 0 π 0 decays to estimate the Dalitz plot parameters.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is shown in our paper [5] that the event distributions in the Dalitz plots for K + and K − decays are identical. Taking this into account we used combined statistics for K ± → π ± π 0 π 0 decays to estimate the Dalitz plot parameters.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For example, the difference of the Dalitz plot slopes g obtained in [2] and [3] is equal to 0.109 ± 0.021. As shown by our data [5] this result cannot be explained by CP violation and is most probably due to underestimation of systematic uncertainties. In this paper we present new results on the Dalitz plot parameters based on the analysis of 493k events of K ± → π ± π 0 π 0 decays collected with the TNF-IHEP facility [5,6].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best present measurement are [6] A c g =(22 ± 15 ± 37) · 10 −4 (prelim.) and [7] A n g =(2 ± 19) · 10 −4 based on 54 · 10 6 and 620 · 10 3 events respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%