2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.96.024608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the cross sections of theW186(n,γ)W187, 

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluated curve of JEFF-3.3 passes only through the experimental point of Qaim and Graca [4] within experimental error. In contrast, the results of Ganguly and Bakhru [5] and Poularikas et al [6] are much higher than the values of three excitation function curves and those of the theoretical excitation curve at the corresponding energies. The theoretical excitation curve based on TALYS-1.9 matches our experimental cross-section data and the result of Qaim and Graca [4] well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The evaluated curve of JEFF-3.3 passes only through the experimental point of Qaim and Graca [4] within experimental error. In contrast, the results of Ganguly and Bakhru [5] and Poularikas et al [6] are much higher than the values of three excitation function curves and those of the theoretical excitation curve at the corresponding energies. The theoretical excitation curve based on TALYS-1.9 matches our experimental cross-section data and the result of Qaim and Graca [4] well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Owing to the use of high-resolution detectors, there was no difficulty. However, for the measurement of the cross section of the 182 W(n,2n) 181 W reaction, the energy of the characteristic gamma-ray selected is 152.32 keV, which is still affected by a gamma-ray 13.4 0.25±0.04 [22] 13.65 0.4±0.06 [22] 13.88 0.48±0.07 [22] 14.28 0.57±0.08 [22] 14.58 0.65±0.09 [22] 14.87 0.83±0.11 [22] 14.6 0.54±0.05 [11] 13.33 0.237±0.6 [15] 13.56 0.311±0.57 [15] 14.66 0.6±0.11 [15] 14.93 0.64±0.13 [15] 14.7 0.55±0.07 [4] 14.5 0.85 [16] 14.8 2.5±1 [6] with energy close to 152.43 keV and 7.02% intensity of 182 Ta from the 182 W(n, p) 182 Ta+ 183 W(n,d*) 182 Ta+ 184 W(n,t*) 182 Ta reaction after using a different cooling time depending on the half-life of the product. During the cross-section calculation of the 182 W(n,2n) 181 W reaction, a formula was used to subtract the effect of the gamma-ray with 152.43 keV energy and 7.02% intensity of 182 Ta from the others that affect the measured reaction [41].…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations