1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.464017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the dc electric dipole polarizabilities of the alkali dimer molecules, homonuclear and heteronuclear

Abstract: Calculations of long-range potential wells for highly excited homonuclear and heteronuclear alkali dimers Erratum: Measurements of the electric dipole polarizabilities of the alkali halide dimers [J. Chem. Phys. 8 0, 3580 (1984)] J. Chem. Phys. 81, 2189 (1984); 10.1063/1.448196 Measurements of the electric dipole polarizabilities of the alkali halide dimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
49
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
13
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[26], respectively: the difference between these two values corresponds to only about 2 × 10 −6 E h . In any case, the experimental D e value for 7 Li 2 is smaller than that for 6 Li 2 , leading one to expect that the Born-Oppenheimer limit may lie somewhat higher, if anything, than −14.9949 E h . As a matter of fact, Sun et al [25] quote for it a value of −14.9945 E h , citing a personal communication by R. K. Owen and R. N. Barnett.…”
Section: Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 86%
“…[26], respectively: the difference between these two values corresponds to only about 2 × 10 −6 E h . In any case, the experimental D e value for 7 Li 2 is smaller than that for 6 Li 2 , leading one to expect that the Born-Oppenheimer limit may lie somewhat higher, if anything, than −14.9949 E h . As a matter of fact, Sun et al [25] quote for it a value of −14.9945 E h , citing a personal communication by R. K. Owen and R. N. Barnett.…”
Section: Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The static polarizability plays an important role in the charctarization of the clusters and it is one of the property which has been extensively We begin our discussion on the results for polarizabilities by first testing the accuracies of SAOP and MP2 results for dimer and tetramer against the corresponding data obtained with a large basis set coupled cluster theory with single and double excitations and perturbative triple excitation (CCSD(T)) calculations [33]. In Table IV we present the results for polarizabilities of K 2 and K 4 obtained with three different methods along with the other theoretical [31,56] and experimental [18,57] results for the dimer which are already available in literature. From Table IV, we notice that the results for the dimer obtained by CCSD(T) approach vary from 486 to 510 a.u.…”
Section: B Polarizability Of Potassium Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected value of this shift is given by ∆ν = α 6s − α 6p 3/2 P/(πhε 0 cw 2 0 ), where α 6s and α 6p 3/2 are the electrostatic polarizabilities of atoms in 6s and 6p 3/2 states [18], P is the power of the laser beam and w 0 its waist. Considering an available power of 110 W, we find w 0 = 84±4 µm, leading to an atomic potential depth of 0.9 mK and a molecular one of 1.5 mK, calculated with the Cs 2 static polarizability given in [19]. Considering similar atomic QUEST experiments [16], we assume an atomic trap temperature T ≈ 40 +10 −10 µK.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%