2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60400-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures for brain connectivity analysis: nodes centrality and their invariant patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [45] the authors investigated the high dynamical complexity of the brain, as a small world topology. They compared four nonlinear connectivity measures and show that each method characterizes distinct features of brain interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [45] the authors investigated the high dynamical complexity of the brain, as a small world topology. They compared four nonlinear connectivity measures and show that each method characterizes distinct features of brain interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the centrality properties of networks and define their hubs, we used a measure based on the shortest path length concept, called betweenness centrality ( ). This measure was used alongside the method for hub definition proposed by da Silva et al [ 32 ]. For two given nodes k and j from the set of nodes N , the shortest path length is defined by , where belongs to a connectivity matrix and is the shortest path length between the nodes i and j [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this measure, we applied the method of da Silva et al [ 32 ] to identify hubs from nodes. We used a left-sided Mann–Whitney test with significance level of to compare the value of each node with all remaining nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%