“…In sum, a broader model is proposed where religiosity influences sustainable consumption, which then influences consumer well‐being. This expectation follows the connection between religiosity and sustainable consumption, as discussed in support for H1 (cf., Leary et al, ; Minton et al, ) and H2 (cf., Minton, ; Wolkomir et al, ), as well as sustainable consumption’s positive connection with subjective well‐being, as discussed in support for H3 (cf., Cloutier et al, ; Dunn et al, ; Paralkar et al, ,). With this mediating expectation, we acknowledge that many other mediators likely exist between religiosity and consumers’ subjective well‐being (e.g., integration in a social network, decreased participation in risky behaviors, altered views of anxiety or stress producing situations).…”